2021Molecular Genetics & Genomic MedicineOpen access

Blood group genotyping in alloimmunized multi‐transfused thalassemia patients from Iran

Reyhaneh Sarihi, Arezoo Oodi, Raziyeh Dadkhah Tehrani, Seyedeh Farzaneh Jalali, Fahimeh Mardani, Azita Azarkeivan, Samira Gudarzi, Naser Amirizadeh

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Serological methods may not be reliable for RBC antigen typing, especially in multi-transfused patients. The blood group systems provoking the most severe transfusion reactions are mainly Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy. We intended to determine the genotype of these blood group system antigens among Iranian alloimmunized thalassemia patients using molecular methods and compare the results with serological phenotyping. METHODS: Two hundred patients participated in this study. Blood group phenotype and genotype were determined using the serological method and PCR-SSP, respectively. The genotypes of patients with incompatibility between phenotype and genotype were re-evaluated by RFLP-PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Discrepancies between phenotype and genotype results were found in 132 alleles and 83 (41.5%) patients; however, there was complete accordance between the three genotyping methods. Most discrepancies were detected in Rh and Duffy systems with 47 and 45 cases, respectively, and the main discrepancy was in the FY*B/FY*B allele when serologically showed Fy(a+b+). All 39 undetermined phenotypes, due to mixed-field reactions, were resolved by molecular genotyping. CONCLUSION: Molecular genotyping is more reliable compared with the serological method, especially in multi-transfused patients. Therefore, the addition of blood group genotyping to serological assays can lead to an antigen-matched transfusion in these patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Serological methods may not be reliable for RBC antigen typing, especially in multi-transfused patients. The blood group systems provoking the most severe transfusion reactions are mainly Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy. We intended to determine the genotype of these blood group system antigens among Iranian alloimmunized thalassemia patients using molecular methods and compare the results with serological phenotyping. METHODS: Two hundred patients participated in this study. Blood group phenotype and genotype were determined using the serological method and PCR-SSP, respectively. The genotypes of patients with incompatibility between phenotype and genotype were re-evaluated by RFLP-PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Discrepancies between phenotype and genotype results were found in 132 alleles and 83 (41.5%) patients; however, there was complete accordance between the three genotyping methods. Most discrepancies were detected in Rh and Duffy systems with 47 and 45 cases, respectively, and the main discrepancy was in the FY*B/FY*B allele when serologically showed Fy(a+b+). All 39 undetermined phenotypes, due to mixed-field reactions, were resolved by molecular genotyping. CONCLUSION: Molecular genotyping is more reliable compared with the serological method, especially in multi-transfused patients. Therefore, the addition of blood group genotyping to serological assays can lead to an antigen-matched transfusion in these patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Serological methods may not be reliable for RBC antigen typing, especially in multi-transfused patients. The blood group systems provoking the most severe transfusion reactions are mainly Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy. We intended to determine the genotype of these blood group system antigens among Iranian alloimmunized thalassemia patients using molecular methods and compare the results with serological phenotyping. METHODS: Two hundred patients participated in this study. Blood group phenotype and genotype were determined using the serological method and PCR-SSP, respectively. The genotypes of patients with incompatibility between phenotype and genotype were re-evaluated by RFLP-PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Discrepancies between phenotype and genotype results were found in 132 alleles and 83 (41.5%) patients; however, there was complete accordance between the three genotyping methods. Most discrepancies were detected in Rh and Duffy systems with 47 and 45 cases, respectively, and the main discrepancy was in the FY*B/FY*B allele when serologically showed Fy(a+b+). All 39 undetermined phenotypes, due to mixed-field reactions, were resolved by molecular genotyping. CONCLUSION: Molecular genotyping is more reliable compared with the serological method, especially in multi-transfused patients. Therefore, the addition of blood group genotyping to serological assays can lead to an antigen-matched transfusion in these patients.

Key concepts: Genotyping, Serology, Genotype, Typing, Thalassemia, Allele, Immunology, Antigen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Blood group genotyping in alloimmunized multi‐transfused thalassemia patients from Iran — Research Paper | ScholarLens