2014•Luyou xuekanRequires access

Spatial Panel Econometric Analysis of Tourism Economic Growth and Its Spillover Effects

WU Yu-min

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Over the course of the last decade,tourism research has been dominated by time series or cross-sectional econometric modeling techniques. But these models have limitations; the time series model overlooks the cross-sectional impact of regional tourism activity,while the traditional crosssectional model ignores the spatial interdependence of regions. When modeling economic growth in the tourism industry,these techniques fail to account for spillover effects: the benefits regions obtain from economic growth in local tourism from their neighbors' input and output flows through regional inputoutput interactions. The most important factors,capital and labor flows from different regions,can have spillover effects or agglomeration effects on economic growth in tourism in neighboring regions. Given the shortcomings of the time series and cross-sectional techniques,most tourism studies failed to consider that spatial effects universally influence economic growth in regional tourism and,consequently,their results have not been persuasive or reliable. While,since 2010,some Chinese tourism studies have focused on the spatial econometric techniques to address spatial interdependence among regions,the majority have ignored temporal and spatial correlations and their potential impact on economic growth in regional tourism.This study takes a different approach by employing spatial panel econometrics models of no fixed effects,spatial fixed effects,time-period fixed effects,and spatial and time-period fixed effects. Based on the Solow growth model and tourism panel data of 31 Chinese provinces over 2001 ~ 2009,we investigate whether spatial dependence of economic growth in the tourism industry exists across Chinese provinces. We also estimate the contributions of capital and labor to economic growth in the tourism industry of neighboring regions,and test for spillover effects in economic growth. The results show a strengthening in spatial dependence and clustering trends of economic growth in Chinese provincial tourism during 2001 ~ 2009. In addition,the spillover effects of economic growth and spatial tourism capital investment from the neighboring provinces are significant. From these results,we suggest that spatial correlation of economic growth in provincial tourism should be considered in elasticity estimation studies of economic growth in the tourism industry. As the elasticity coefficients of capital and labor investment to tourism output are positive,the contribution of capital to economic growth in the tourism industry is greater than that of labor. While capital inputs are the key driver of economic growth in tourism at the provincial level,evidenced by tourism growth patterns matching capital inflows,the contribution of labor to economic growth in tourism has not been fully played out. To develop effective tourism industry policies and development plans,governments have to be aware of the spatial dependence of economic growth in tourism,and the impact of capital inputs and labor force contributions. Furthermore,their policies should encourage cooperation and exchanges of tourism capital and labor inputs across neighborhoods,promote capital spatial spillover effects in economic growth in tourism,and reform the distribution systems of national income. They should also take advantage of the opportunity to manage spatial interactions between adjacent provinces in terms of tourism labor investment and economic growth in tourism,thereby increasing the collaborative contributions of labor investment from adjacent regions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the course of the last decade,tourism research has been dominated by time series or cross-sectional econometric modeling techniques. But these models have limitations; the time series model overlooks the cross-sectional impact of regional tourism activity,while the traditional crosssectional model ignores the spatial interdependence of regions. When modeling economic growth in the tourism industry,these techniques fail to account for spillover effects: the benefits regions obtain from economic growth in local tourism from their neighbors' input and output flows through regional inputoutput interactions. The most important factors,capital and labor flows from different regions,can have spillover effects or agglomeration effects on economic growth in tourism in neighboring regions. Given the shortcomings of the time series and cross-sectional techniques,most tourism studies failed to consider that spatial effects universally influence economic growth in regional tourism and,consequently,their results have not been persuasive or reliable. While,since 2010,some Chinese tourism studies have focused on the spatial econometric techniques to address spatial interdependence among regions,the majority have ignored temporal and spatial correlations and their potential impact on economic growth in regional tourism.This study takes a different approach by employing spatial panel econometrics models of no fixed effects,spatial fixed effects,time-period fixed effects,and spatial and time-period fixed effects. Based on the Solow growth model and tourism panel data of 31 Chinese provinces over 2001 ~ 2009,we investigate whether spatial dependence of economic growth in the tourism industry exists across Chinese provinces. We also estimate the contributions of capital and labor to economic growth in the tourism industry of neighboring regions,and test for spillover effects in economic growth. The results show a strengthening in spatial dependence and clustering trends of economic growth in Chinese provincial tourism during 2001 ~ 2009. In addition,the spillover effects of economic growth and spatial tourism capital investment from the neighboring provinces are significant. From these results,we suggest that spatial correlation of economic growth in provincial tourism should be considered in elasticity estimation studies of economic growth in the tourism industry. As the elasticity coefficients of capital and labor investment to tourism output are positive,the contribution of capital to economic growth in the tourism industry is greater than that of labor. While capital inputs are the key driver of economic growth in tourism at the provincial level,evidenced by tourism growth patterns matching capital inflows,the contribution of labor to economic growth in tourism has not been fully played out. To develop effective tourism industry policies and development plans,governments have to be aware of the spatial dependence of economic growth in tourism,and the impact of capital inputs and labor force contributions. Furthermore,their policies should encourage cooperation and exchanges of tourism capital and labor inputs across neighborhoods,promote capital spatial spillover effects in economic growth in tourism,and reform the distribution systems of national income. They should also take advantage of the opportunity to manage spatial interactions between adjacent provinces in terms of tourism labor investment and economic growth in tourism,thereby increasing the collaborative contributions of labor investment from adjacent regions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the course of the last decade,tourism research has been dominated by time series or cross-sectional econometric modeling techniques. But these models have limitations; the time series model overlooks the cross-sectional impact of regional tourism activity,while the traditional crosssectional model ignores the spatial interdependence of regions. When modeling economic growth in the tourism industry,these techniques fail to account for spillover effects: the benefits regions obtain from economic growth in local tourism from their neighbors' input and output flows through regional inputoutput interactions. The most important factors,capital and labor flows from different regions,can have spillover effects or agglomeration effects on economic growth in tourism in neighboring regions. Given the shortcomings of the time series and cross-sectional techniques,most tourism studies failed to consider that spatial effects universally influence economic growth in regional tourism and,consequently,their results have not been persuasive or reliable. While,since 2010,some Chinese tourism studies have focused on the spatial econometric techniques to address spatial interdependence among regions,the majority have ignored temporal and spatial correlations and their potential impact on economic growth in regional tourism.This study takes a different approach by employing spatial panel econometrics models of no fixed effects,spatial fixed effects,time-period fixed effects,and spatial and time-period fixed effects. Based on the Solow growth model and tourism panel data of 31 Chinese provinces over 2001 ~ 2009,we investigate whether spatial dependence of economic growth in the tourism industry exists across Chinese provinces. We also estimate the contributions of capital and labor to economic growth in the tourism industry of neighboring regions,and test for spillover effects in economic growth. The results show a strengthening in spatial dependence and clustering trends of economic growth in Chinese provincial tourism during 2001 ~ 2009. In addition,the spillover effects of economic growth and spatial tourism capital investment from the neighboring provinces are significant. From these results,we suggest that spatial correlation of economic growth in provincial tourism should be considered in elasticity estimation studies of economic growth in the tourism industry. As the elasticity coefficients of capital and labor investment to tourism output are positive,the contribution of capital to economic growth in the tourism industry is greater than that of labor. While capital inputs are the key driver of economic growth in tourism at the provincial level,evidenced by tourism growth patterns matching capital inflows,the contribution of labor to economic growth in tourism has not been fully played out. To develop effective tourism industry policies and development plans,governments have to be aware of the spatial dependence of economic growth in tourism,and the impact of capital inputs and labor force contributions. Furthermore,their policies should encourage cooperation and exchanges of tourism capital and labor inputs across neighborhoods,promote capital spatial spillover effects in economic growth in tourism,and reform the distribution systems of national income. They should also take advantage of the opportunity to manage spatial interactions between adjacent provinces in terms of tourism labor investment and economic growth in tourism,thereby increasing the collaborative contributions of labor investment from adjacent regions.

Key concepts: Tourism, Spillover effect, Panel data, Economic geography, Economics, Spatial dependence, Econometric model, Spatial econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spatial Panel Econometric Analysis of Tourism Economic Growth and Its Spillover Effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens