2012•Chinese Journal of Oral ImplantologyRequires access

Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with different etching adhesive and 3M-Z350 flowable resin on young permanent teeth

JI Pei-hon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE:To compare the effect of different etching adhesive and flowable resin in deep pits and fissures of young permanent molars sealant technique.METHODS: Children aged 6-8 years old were included in the study.The split mouth design was used.The first permanent molars were randomly assigned into 2 experimental groups:A and B.The teeth in group A were sealed with flowable resin and self-etching adhesive,while the teeth in group B were sealed with flowable resin and phosphate acid system.The children were followed up every year,and the sealants were observed and evaluated.SPSS13.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS:After 1 year,2 and 3 years,the retention rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(P0.05),while group A had more caries than group B(P 0.05) except at 1-year.CONCLUSION: Self-etching adhesive and flowable resin doesn't have excellent clinical effect on caries prevention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE:To compare the effect of different etching adhesive and flowable resin in deep pits and fissures of young permanent molars sealant technique.METHODS: Children aged 6-8 years old were included in the study.The split mouth design was used.The first permanent molars were randomly assigned into 2 experimental groups:A and B.The teeth in group A were sealed with flowable resin and self-etching adhesive,while the teeth in group B were sealed with flowable resin and phosphate acid system.The children were followed up every year,and the sealants were observed and evaluated.SPSS13.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS:After 1 year,2 and 3 years,the retention rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(P0.05),while group A had more caries than group B(P 0.05) except at 1-year.CONCLUSION: Self-etching adhesive and flowable resin doesn't have excellent clinical effect on caries prevention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE:To compare the effect of different etching adhesive and flowable resin in deep pits and fissures of young permanent molars sealant technique.METHODS: Children aged 6-8 years old were included in the study.The split mouth design was used.The first permanent molars were randomly assigned into 2 experimental groups:A and B.The teeth in group A were sealed with flowable resin and self-etching adhesive,while the teeth in group B were sealed with flowable resin and phosphate acid system.The children were followed up every year,and the sealants were observed and evaluated.SPSS13.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS:After 1 year,2 and 3 years,the retention rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(P0.05),while group A had more caries than group B(P 0.05) except at 1-year.CONCLUSION: Self-etching adhesive and flowable resin doesn't have excellent clinical effect on caries prevention.

Key concepts: Molar, Dentistry, Sealant, Acid etching, Adhesive, Permanent teeth, Etching (microfabrication), Software package

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with different etching adhesive and 3M-Z350 flowable resin on young permanent teeth — Research Paper | ScholarLens