2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Invalidity and Amendment of Granted Patents

Philip W Grubb, Peter R Thomsen, Tom Hoxie, Gordon Wright

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter focuses on the law governing the validity and amendment of patents in the UK and US. The grant of a patent does not guarantee its validity. The chance that a patent will be held to be valid if challenged depends on the completeness of the search performed; the strictness of examination of the patent in the patent office; the legal and technical competence of the patent examiner; the chance of intervention by third parties during the patent office proceedings; and the pro- or anti-patent attitude of the national courts. Patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japanese Patent Office, or US Patent and Trademark Office are subject to a relatively rigorous substantive examination. However, patents in other countries, such as South Africa, Belgium, or even the Netherlands, are granted after a formal examination, without any investigation as to whether the claimed invention meets the patentability criteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter focuses on the law governing the validity and amendment of patents in the UK and US. The grant of a patent does not guarantee its validity. The chance that a patent will be held to be valid if challenged depends on the completeness of the search performed; the strictness of examination of the patent in the patent office; the legal and technical competence of the patent examiner; the chance of intervention by third parties during the patent office proceedings; and the pro- or anti-patent attitude of the national courts. Patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japanese Patent Office, or US Patent and Trademark Office are subject to a relatively rigorous substantive examination. However, patents in other countries, such as South Africa, Belgium, or even the Netherlands, are granted after a formal examination, without any investigation as to whether the claimed invention meets the patentability criteria.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter focuses on the law governing the validity and amendment of patents in the UK and US. The grant of a patent does not guarantee its validity. The chance that a patent will be held to be valid if challenged depends on the completeness of the search performed; the strictness of examination of the patent in the patent office; the legal and technical competence of the patent examiner; the chance of intervention by third parties during the patent office proceedings; and the pro- or anti-patent attitude of the national courts. Patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japanese Patent Office, or US Patent and Trademark Office are subject to a relatively rigorous substantive examination. However, patents in other countries, such as South Africa, Belgium, or even the Netherlands, are granted after a formal examination, without any investigation as to whether the claimed invention meets the patentability criteria.

Key concepts: Patent office, Patentability, Trademark, European patent office, Patent troll, Patent application, Competence (human resources), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Invalidity and Amendment of Granted Patents — Research Paper | ScholarLens