2021역사비평Requires access

A Study on the Anti-Marketization Discourse in North Korea in the Early Marketization (the 1990s~the early 2000s)

Yun-Jae Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the beginning of marketization in the 1990s, the North Korean authorities have pursued market-friendly policies in limited terms. However, contrary to this policy direction, North Korea produced and disseminated anti-market and anti-reform discourse. This study examines the contradictory coexistence of North Korean policies and discourses in the 1990s. Basically, it is necessary to pay attention to the strategic aspects for achieving political and economic goals. The anti-marketing discourse has the following characteristics. First, it has the characteristics of a struggle against marketization discourse that is generated and developed with the progress of marketization, and the struggle of the ruling class to prevent the marketization discourse from becoming the dominant discourse. Second, it is the pursuit of marketization in which groups, not individuals, take the lead. Anti-marketization discourse has the character of anti- marketization discourse of individualism rather than anti-market. Third, it has the character of a check against open marketization, that is, it is not anti-market but anti-‘open’ marketization discourse.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the beginning of marketization in the 1990s, the North Korean authorities have pursued market-friendly policies in limited terms. However, contrary to this policy direction, North Korea produced and disseminated anti-market and anti-reform discourse. This study examines the contradictory coexistence of North Korean policies and discourses in the 1990s. Basically, it is necessary to pay attention to the strategic aspects for achieving political and economic goals. The anti-marketing discourse has the following characteristics. First, it has the characteristics of a struggle against marketization discourse that is generated and developed with the progress of marketization, and the struggle of the ruling class to prevent the marketization discourse from becoming the dominant discourse. Second, it is the pursuit of marketization in which groups, not individuals, take the lead. Anti-marketization discourse has the character of anti- marketization discourse of individualism rather than anti-market. Third, it has the character of a check against open marketization, that is, it is not anti-market but anti-‘open’ marketization discourse.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the beginning of marketization in the 1990s, the North Korean authorities have pursued market-friendly policies in limited terms. However, contrary to this policy direction, North Korea produced and disseminated anti-market and anti-reform discourse. This study examines the contradictory coexistence of North Korean policies and discourses in the 1990s. Basically, it is necessary to pay attention to the strategic aspects for achieving political and economic goals. The anti-marketing discourse has the following characteristics. First, it has the characteristics of a struggle against marketization discourse that is generated and developed with the progress of marketization, and the struggle of the ruling class to prevent the marketization discourse from becoming the dominant discourse. Second, it is the pursuit of marketization in which groups, not individuals, take the lead. Anti-marketization discourse has the character of anti- marketization discourse of individualism rather than anti-market. Third, it has the character of a check against open marketization, that is, it is not anti-market but anti-‘open’ marketization discourse.

Key concepts: Marketization, Individualism, Politics, Discourse analysis, Political science, Economic system, Sociology, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study on the Anti-Marketization Discourse in North Korea in the Early Marketization (the 1990s~the early 2000s) — Research Paper | ScholarLens