2021•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower-Pole Nephrolithiasis

Vincent G. Bird, Michael Seth Borofsky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the results of the Lower Pole Study I study in which patients with symptomatic lower pole renal calculi were randomized to receive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study found that patients receiving ESWL had lower stone-clearance rates and a more frequent need for retreatment but lower morbidity, whereas those receiving PCNL had higher stone-clearance rate and fewer retreatments but greater morbidity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter summarizes the results of the Lower Pole Study I study in which patients with symptomatic lower pole renal calculi were randomized to receive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study found that patients receiving ESWL had lower stone-clearance rates and a more frequent need for retreatment but lower morbidity, whereas those receiving PCNL had higher stone-clearance rate and fewer retreatments but greater morbidity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter summarizes the results of the Lower Pole Study I study in which patients with symptomatic lower pole renal calculi were randomized to receive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study found that patients receiving ESWL had lower stone-clearance rates and a more frequent need for retreatment but lower morbidity, whereas those receiving PCNL had higher stone-clearance rate and fewer retreatments but greater morbidity.

Key concepts: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Medicine, Lithotripsy, Renal stone, Surgery, Extracorporeal, Percutaneous

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower-Pole Nephrolithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens