1992Scandinavian Journal of Urology and NephrologyRequires access

Results of One and Two Year Follow-Up in a Clinical Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Calculi

Nicholas Mays, Ann Petruckevitch, Peter Burney

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The results of 12 and 24 month follow-up of two groups of similar patients with renal and ureteric calculi treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) and related techniques versus first generation, Dornier extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) alone or in combination with PCN and/or endoscopy indicated few major differences in the side-effects (complications, readmissions, further procedures) of the two approaches to renal stone treatment up to two years from treatment. However, PCN patients exhibited consistently higher rates of stone clearance whether this was measured cross-sectionally or cumulatively. The higher prevalence of retained fragments in the ESWL group indicates the importance of long-term monitoring of both groups to discover whether there are any significant differences in stone growth and retreatment rates associated with the observed difference in stone-free rates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The results of 12 and 24 month follow-up of two groups of similar patients with renal and ureteric calculi treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) and related techniques versus first generation, Dornier extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) alone or in combination with PCN and/or endoscopy indicated few major differences in the side-effects (complications, readmissions, further procedures) of the two approaches to renal stone treatment up to two years from treatment. However, PCN patients exhibited consistently higher rates of stone clearance whether this was measured cross-sectionally or cumulatively. The higher prevalence of retained fragments in the ESWL group indicates the importance of long-term monitoring of both groups to discover whether there are any significant differences in stone growth and retreatment rates associated with the observed difference in stone-free rates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The results of 12 and 24 month follow-up of two groups of similar patients with renal and ureteric calculi treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) and related techniques versus first generation, Dornier extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) alone or in combination with PCN and/or endoscopy indicated few major differences in the side-effects (complications, readmissions, further procedures) of the two approaches to renal stone treatment up to two years from treatment. However, PCN patients exhibited consistently higher rates of stone clearance whether this was measured cross-sectionally or cumulatively. The higher prevalence of retained fragments in the ESWL group indicates the importance of long-term monitoring of both groups to discover whether there are any significant differences in stone growth and retreatment rates associated with the observed difference in stone-free rates.

Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Lithotripsy, Renal stone, Percutaneous, Nephrology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Results of One and Two Year Follow-Up in a Clinical Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Calculi — Research Paper | ScholarLens