2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Sociobiology and Human Development

Richard M. Lerner, Alexander von Eye

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Wilson contended that sociobiology would be the “master” synthetic discipline, a field enveloping all of behavioral and social science. Our assessment draws on and extends prior discussions of sociobiological ideas, particularly in our concern with issues relevant to human development and in our provision of an alternative to sociobio–logical views of the role of biology in human development, one based on a developmental contextual perspective regarding human development. A parallel arises between the views of sociobiologists and the ideas of Konrad Lorenz. Lorenz saw human aggression as both inevitable and inherent in the human genome—to the point of providing for innate “militant enthusiasm.” Perhaps he means that sociobiology is not a “theory” but only a “perspective,” or merely a rather general framework within which to study systematically the biological and, therefore, ultimately, the genetic basis of all social behavior.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wilson contended that sociobiology would be the “master” synthetic discipline, a field enveloping all of behavioral and social science. Our assessment draws on and extends prior discussions of sociobiological ideas, particularly in our concern with issues relevant to human development and in our provision of an alternative to sociobio–logical views of the role of biology in human development, one based on a developmental contextual perspective regarding human development. A parallel arises between the views of sociobiologists and the ideas of Konrad Lorenz. Lorenz saw human aggression as both inevitable and inherent in the human genome—to the point of providing for innate “militant enthusiasm.” Perhaps he means that sociobiology is not a “theory” but only a “perspective,” or merely a rather general framework within which to study systematically the biological and, therefore, ultimately, the genetic basis of all social behavior.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wilson contended that sociobiology would be the “master” synthetic discipline, a field enveloping all of behavioral and social science. Our assessment draws on and extends prior discussions of sociobiological ideas, particularly in our concern with issues relevant to human development and in our provision of an alternative to sociobio–logical views of the role of biology in human development, one based on a developmental contextual perspective regarding human development. A parallel arises between the views of sociobiologists and the ideas of Konrad Lorenz. Lorenz saw human aggression as both inevitable and inherent in the human genome—to the point of providing for innate “militant enthusiasm.” Perhaps he means that sociobiology is not a “theory” but only a “perspective,” or merely a rather general framework within which to study systematically the biological and, therefore, ultimately, the genetic basis of all social behavior.

Key concepts: Sociobiology, Psychology, Cognitive science, Sociology, Anthropology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sociobiology and Human Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens