1980UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)Requires access

Sociobiology, Selfish Genes, and Human Behavior: A Bio-Cultural Critique

Jon Marks

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Sociobiology is a controversial new field of study, defined by its most prolific spokesman as systematic study of the biological basis of all social behavior (Wilson 1975a:k). Although much excellent work has been done in this field within the areas of entomology and ornithology, the application of sociobiology to humans (Wilson 1975a:5k7ff; Wilson 1975b; Hamilton 1975; etc.) has generated considerable acrimonious debate (Caplan 1978), This paper represents an attempt to present sociobiology and social anthropology fairly, and to evaluate the central arguments of sociobiology within a synthetic framework of biology and social anthropology. My purpose in this paper is to explore the foundations upon which human sociobiology is constructed; to demonstrate that human sociobiology is not so much a more scientific approach to anthropology as it is a novel philosophical approach; and to evaluate critically the value of such an approach in the study of human behavior.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sociobiology is a controversial new field of study, defined by its most prolific spokesman as systematic study of the biological basis of all social behavior (Wilson 1975a:k). Although much excellent work has been done in this field within the areas of entomology and ornithology, the application of sociobiology to humans (Wilson 1975a:5k7ff; Wilson 1975b; Hamilton 1975; etc.) has generated considerable acrimonious debate (Caplan 1978), This paper represents an attempt to present sociobiology and social anthropology fairly, and to evaluate the central arguments of sociobiology within a synthetic framework of biology and social anthropology. My purpose in this paper is to explore the foundations upon which human sociobiology is constructed; to demonstrate that human sociobiology is not so much a more scientific approach to anthropology as it is a novel philosophical approach; and to evaluate critically the value of such an approach in the study of human behavior.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sociobiology is a controversial new field of study, defined by its most prolific spokesman as systematic study of the biological basis of all social behavior (Wilson 1975a:k). Although much excellent work has been done in this field within the areas of entomology and ornithology, the application of sociobiology to humans (Wilson 1975a:5k7ff; Wilson 1975b; Hamilton 1975; etc.) has generated considerable acrimonious debate (Caplan 1978), This paper represents an attempt to present sociobiology and social anthropology fairly, and to evaluate the central arguments of sociobiology within a synthetic framework of biology and social anthropology. My purpose in this paper is to explore the foundations upon which human sociobiology is constructed; to demonstrate that human sociobiology is not so much a more scientific approach to anthropology as it is a novel philosophical approach; and to evaluate critically the value of such an approach in the study of human behavior.

Key concepts: Sociobiology, Field (mathematics), Sociology, Epistemology, Human biology, Biological anthropology, Anthropology, Social science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sociobiology, Selfish Genes, and Human Behavior: A Bio-Cultural Critique — Research Paper | ScholarLens