2021International journal of nanodimension.Requires access

Conventional vs. junctionless gate-stack DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter

Shubham Tayal, Pachimatla Samrat, Vadula Keerthi, Biswajit Jena, Karthik Rajendra

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In this article, the high-k gate dielectric effect on the operation of complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) inverter build using conventional (CL) double-gate (DG) metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) and junctionless (JL) double-gate (DG) MOSFET has been explored. It is found that the improvement in inverter performance is more pronounced in CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter in comparison to JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter when SiO2 is replaced by the high-k dielectric at gate oxide. The improvement in low noise margin (ΔNML), high noise margin (ΔNMH), gain (ΔA) & propagation delay (Δp d) is 3.19%, 1.64%, 5.2% & 0.9% respectively when SiO2 is replaced by TiO2 at gate oxide in case of CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter whereas it is 1.96%, 1.24%, 3.4% & 1.71% respectively in case of JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter. Consequently, the utilization of high-k dielectric as gate oxide is more advantageous in CL-DG-MOSFET devices for improved stability and gain of CMOS inverter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, the high-k gate dielectric effect on the operation of complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) inverter build using conventional (CL) double-gate (DG) metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) and junctionless (JL) double-gate (DG) MOSFET has been explored. It is found that the improvement in inverter performance is more pronounced in CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter in comparison to JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter when SiO2 is replaced by the high-k dielectric at gate oxide. The improvement in low noise margin (ΔNML), high noise margin (ΔNMH), gain (ΔA) & propagation delay (Δp d) is 3.19%, 1.64%, 5.2% & 0.9% respectively when SiO2 is replaced by TiO2 at gate oxide in case of CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter whereas it is 1.96%, 1.24%, 3.4% & 1.71% respectively in case of JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter. Consequently, the utilization of high-k dielectric as gate oxide is more advantageous in CL-DG-MOSFET devices for improved stability and gain of CMOS inverter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, the high-k gate dielectric effect on the operation of complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) inverter build using conventional (CL) double-gate (DG) metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) and junctionless (JL) double-gate (DG) MOSFET has been explored. It is found that the improvement in inverter performance is more pronounced in CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter in comparison to JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter when SiO2 is replaced by the high-k dielectric at gate oxide. The improvement in low noise margin (ΔNML), high noise margin (ΔNMH), gain (ΔA) & propagation delay (Δp d) is 3.19%, 1.64%, 5.2% & 0.9% respectively when SiO2 is replaced by TiO2 at gate oxide in case of CL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter whereas it is 1.96%, 1.24%, 3.4% & 1.71% respectively in case of JL-DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter. Consequently, the utilization of high-k dielectric as gate oxide is more advantageous in CL-DG-MOSFET devices for improved stability and gain of CMOS inverter.

Key concepts: Inverter, Noise margin, MOSFET, CMOS, Electrical engineering, Materials science, Optoelectronics, Gate oxide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conventional vs. junctionless gate-stack DG-MOSFET based CMOS inverter — Research Paper | ScholarLens