2020Journal of Critical ReviewsOpen access

CRYPTOCURRENCIES IN THEORY OF MONEY AND CREDIT: AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE

Sameti Morteza, Mohammad Djawadi, Emadzadeh Mostafa

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Theories of money and credit can be divided into two general categories: commodity theory of money and credit theory of money. Both categories theoretically question the acceptance of cryptocurrencies as money. The present study aimed to provide a new interpretation of the Theory of Money and Credit in relation to both theories mentioned above. First, the functions of “public trust” was taken as a commodity, which is consistent with Karl Menger’s views and the subjective theory of value. Based on this approach, the definitions of the credit theory of money will be acceptable with a new interpretation. This new interpretation also involves an extension of Hayek's definition of money, which is consistent with Mises' definition of money. Then, the concept of intertemporal preferences, with an emphasis on the barter root of money based on Mises’ regression theorem, was used to show that cryptocurrencies can be accepted as money as far as they serve as private currency and suit the computability of dynamics of “Underlying Economic Realities” with intertemporal preferences. Therefore, the main criterion for defining money is how it affects intertemporal preferences

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Theories of money and credit can be divided into two general categories: commodity theory of money and credit theory of money. Both categories theoretically question the acceptance of cryptocurrencies as money. The present study aimed to provide a new interpretation of the Theory of Money and Credit in relation to both theories mentioned above. First, the functions of “public trust” was taken as a commodity, which is consistent with Karl Menger’s views and the subjective theory of value. Based on this approach, the definitions of the credit theory of money will be acceptable with a new interpretation. This new interpretation also involves an extension of Hayek's definition of money, which is consistent with Mises' definition of money. Then, the concept of intertemporal preferences, with an emphasis on the barter root of money based on Mises’ regression theorem, was used to show that cryptocurrencies can be accepted as money as far as they serve as private currency and suit the computability of dynamics of “Underlying Economic Realities” with intertemporal preferences. Therefore, the main criterion for defining money is how it affects intertemporal preferences

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Theories of money and credit can be divided into two general categories: commodity theory of money and credit theory of money. Both categories theoretically question the acceptance of cryptocurrencies as money. The present study aimed to provide a new interpretation of the Theory of Money and Credit in relation to both theories mentioned above. First, the functions of “public trust” was taken as a commodity, which is consistent with Karl Menger’s views and the subjective theory of value. Based on this approach, the definitions of the credit theory of money will be acceptable with a new interpretation. This new interpretation also involves an extension of Hayek's definition of money, which is consistent with Mises' definition of money. Then, the concept of intertemporal preferences, with an emphasis on the barter root of money based on Mises’ regression theorem, was used to show that cryptocurrencies can be accepted as money as far as they serve as private currency and suit the computability of dynamics of “Underlying Economic Realities” with intertemporal preferences. Therefore, the main criterion for defining money is how it affects intertemporal preferences

Key concepts: Economics, Fiat money, Endogenous money, Quantity theory of money, Cryptocurrency, Money measurement concept, Barter, Financial transaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CRYPTOCURRENCIES IN THEORY OF MONEY AND CREDIT: AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE — Research Paper | ScholarLens