2014Research Journal of Finance and AccountingRequires access

A Critical Narrative on the Theories of Money

Ebney Ayaj Rana

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Although money is now used as a generally acceptable medium of exchange, the emergence of it was due to unintended consequence of human actions. Since the emergence as the medium of exchange, money underwent several theoretical developments as regards its nature, function and use in the economy. This paper aims at presenting a brief account of the dominant theoretical developments of money. Firstly, a brief analysis of the origin of money as a generally acceptable medium of exchange is developed in this paper. Secondly, the classical functions of money are revisited and finally, the dominant theoretical developments of money – the classical foundations, the quantity theory of money, Keynes’ theory of money, neoclassical theories of money, monetarist school of thought, and post-Keynesian theory of money – are discussed critically on a brief account. Keywords: Medium of exchange, Quantity theory of money, Barter system, Classical dichotomy, Commodity, Unintended consequence

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although money is now used as a generally acceptable medium of exchange, the emergence of it was due to unintended consequence of human actions. Since the emergence as the medium of exchange, money underwent several theoretical developments as regards its nature, function and use in the economy. This paper aims at presenting a brief account of the dominant theoretical developments of money. Firstly, a brief analysis of the origin of money as a generally acceptable medium of exchange is developed in this paper. Secondly, the classical functions of money are revisited and finally, the dominant theoretical developments of money – the classical foundations, the quantity theory of money, Keynes’ theory of money, neoclassical theories of money, monetarist school of thought, and post-Keynesian theory of money – are discussed critically on a brief account. Keywords: Medium of exchange, Quantity theory of money, Barter system, Classical dichotomy, Commodity, Unintended consequence

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although money is now used as a generally acceptable medium of exchange, the emergence of it was due to unintended consequence of human actions. Since the emergence as the medium of exchange, money underwent several theoretical developments as regards its nature, function and use in the economy. This paper aims at presenting a brief account of the dominant theoretical developments of money. Firstly, a brief analysis of the origin of money as a generally acceptable medium of exchange is developed in this paper. Secondly, the classical functions of money are revisited and finally, the dominant theoretical developments of money – the classical foundations, the quantity theory of money, Keynes’ theory of money, neoclassical theories of money, monetarist school of thought, and post-Keynesian theory of money – are discussed critically on a brief account. Keywords: Medium of exchange, Quantity theory of money, Barter system, Classical dichotomy, Commodity, Unintended consequence

Key concepts: Quantity theory of money, Economics, Barter, Fiat money, Endogenous money, Monetarism, Medium of exchange, Money measurement concept

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Critical Narrative on the Theories of Money — Research Paper | ScholarLens