Principal Agent Theory and Private Property Rights in China's Economic Reform
Ping Yung
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ping Yung
Abstract
Open-access reader
As a contribution to the wider institutional analysis of China's enterprise reform, this paper analyzed three interrelated problems in the literature.It argued that principal-agent theory was not suitable for analysis of China's public enterprises, notably state-owned enterprises, as by definition, it requires a decision-making principal and clearly defined property rights.Actual problems of the theory's application included the enigmatic identity of the principals and the inability of deducing refutable hypotheses.One primary reason for the divergent views on the identity of principals was the widespread misconceptions on the private property rights.This misconception further led to divergent views on the nature of another important actor in China's economy, the township and village enterprises.It is hoped that clarification of these three concepts would facilitate further and better understanding of the transition economy in China.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As a contribution to the wider institutional analysis of China's enterprise reform, this paper analyzed three interrelated problems in the literature.It argued that principal-agent theory was not suitable for analysis of China's public enterprises, notably state-owned enterprises, as by definition, it requires a decision-making principal and clearly defined property rights.Actual problems of the theory's application included the enigmatic identity of the principals and the inability of deducing refutable hypotheses.One primary reason for the divergent views on the identity of principals was the widespread misconceptions on the private property rights.This misconception further led to divergent views on the nature of another important actor in China's economy, the township and village enterprises.It is hoped that clarification of these three concepts would facilitate further and better understanding of the transition economy in China.
Key concepts: Property rights, China, Principal (computer security), Economic reform, Property (philosophy), Principal part, Economic system, Law and economics