2009China An International JournalOpen access

Principal Agent Theory and Private Property Rights in China's Economic Reform

Ping Yung

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

As a contribution to the wider institutional analysis of China's enterprise reform, this paper analyzed three interrelated problems in the literature.It argued that principal-agent theory was not suitable for analysis of China's public enterprises, notably state-owned enterprises, as by definition, it requires a decision-making principal and clearly defined property rights.Actual problems of the theory's application included the enigmatic identity of the principals and the inability of deducing refutable hypotheses.One primary reason for the divergent views on the identity of principals was the widespread misconceptions on the private property rights.This misconception further led to divergent views on the nature of another important actor in China's economy, the township and village enterprises.It is hoped that clarification of these three concepts would facilitate further and better understanding of the transition economy in China.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a contribution to the wider institutional analysis of China's enterprise reform, this paper analyzed three interrelated problems in the literature.It argued that principal-agent theory was not suitable for analysis of China's public enterprises, notably state-owned enterprises, as by definition, it requires a decision-making principal and clearly defined property rights.Actual problems of the theory's application included the enigmatic identity of the principals and the inability of deducing refutable hypotheses.One primary reason for the divergent views on the identity of principals was the widespread misconceptions on the private property rights.This misconception further led to divergent views on the nature of another important actor in China's economy, the township and village enterprises.It is hoped that clarification of these three concepts would facilitate further and better understanding of the transition economy in China.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a contribution to the wider institutional analysis of China's enterprise reform, this paper analyzed three interrelated problems in the literature.It argued that principal-agent theory was not suitable for analysis of China's public enterprises, notably state-owned enterprises, as by definition, it requires a decision-making principal and clearly defined property rights.Actual problems of the theory's application included the enigmatic identity of the principals and the inability of deducing refutable hypotheses.One primary reason for the divergent views on the identity of principals was the widespread misconceptions on the private property rights.This misconception further led to divergent views on the nature of another important actor in China's economy, the township and village enterprises.It is hoped that clarification of these three concepts would facilitate further and better understanding of the transition economy in China.

Key concepts: Property rights, China, Principal (computer security), Economic reform, Property (philosophy), Principal part, Economic system, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Principal Agent Theory and Private Property Rights in China's Economic Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens