Additive utility in prospect theory
Han Bleichrodt, Ulrich Schmidt, Horst Zank
Abstract
Open-access reader
Han Bleichrodt, Ulrich Schmidt, Horst Zank
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract. Prospect theory is currently the main descriptive theory of decision under un-certainty. It generalizes expected utility by introducing nonlinear decision weighting and loss aversion. A difficulty in the study of multiattribute utility under prospect theory is to determine when an attribute yields a gain or a loss. One possibility, adopted in the theoretical literature on multiattribute utility under prospect theory, is to assume that a decision maker determines whether the complete outcome is a gain or a loss. In this holistic evaluation, decision weighting and loss aversion are general and attribute-independent. Another possibility, more common in the empirical literature, is to assume that a decision maker has a reference point for each at-tribute. We give preference foundations for this attribute-specific evaluation in which decision weighting and loss aversion are depending on the attributes. ∗Acknowledgements: Tony Marley, Peter P. Wakker, and two anonymous reviewers gave helpful com-ments. Han Bleichrodt’s research was made possible by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract. Prospect theory is currently the main descriptive theory of decision under un-certainty. It generalizes expected utility by introducing nonlinear decision weighting and loss aversion. A difficulty in the study of multiattribute utility under prospect theory is to determine when an attribute yields a gain or a loss. One possibility, adopted in the theoretical literature on multiattribute utility under prospect theory, is to assume that a decision maker determines whether the complete outcome is a gain or a loss. In this holistic evaluation, decision weighting and loss aversion are general and attribute-independent. Another possibility, more common in the empirical literature, is to assume that a decision maker has a reference point for each at-tribute. We give preference foundations for this attribute-specific evaluation in which decision weighting and loss aversion are depending on the attributes. ∗Acknowledgements: Tony Marley, Peter P. Wakker, and two anonymous reviewers gave helpful com-ments. Han Bleichrodt’s research was made possible by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for
Key concepts: Prospect theory, Loss aversion, Weighting, Expected utility hypothesis, Preference, Decision theory, Cumulative prospect theory, Decision maker