2008University of New South Wales law journalRequires access

The Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: What Role for Complementary Emissions Reduction Regulatory Measures?

Rosemary Lyster

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

While emissions trading is emerging as the optimal strategy for reducing GHG emissions, there seems to be a difference of opinion as to whether other emissions reduction measures should, or indeed could, coexist with an ETS.7 When the Stern Review Report recommended the establishment of a carbon price, it also emphasised the importance of policies to stimulate the development of low carbon technologies,8 and the removal of barriers to behavioural change. Stern concluded that leaving out any one of the recommended elements for dealing with climate change will significantly increase the costs of any action which is taken to reduce GHG emissions. This article highlights the complementary measures which currently exist or are under development in Australia, and considers various perspectives on whether they are needed to reduce emissions from the stationary energy sector.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While emissions trading is emerging as the optimal strategy for reducing GHG emissions, there seems to be a difference of opinion as to whether other emissions reduction measures should, or indeed could, coexist with an ETS.7 When the Stern Review Report recommended the establishment of a carbon price, it also emphasised the importance of policies to stimulate the development of low carbon technologies,8 and the removal of barriers to behavioural change. Stern concluded that leaving out any one of the recommended elements for dealing with climate change will significantly increase the costs of any action which is taken to reduce GHG emissions. This article highlights the complementary measures which currently exist or are under development in Australia, and considers various perspectives on whether they are needed to reduce emissions from the stationary energy sector.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While emissions trading is emerging as the optimal strategy for reducing GHG emissions, there seems to be a difference of opinion as to whether other emissions reduction measures should, or indeed could, coexist with an ETS.7 When the Stern Review Report recommended the establishment of a carbon price, it also emphasised the importance of policies to stimulate the development of low carbon technologies,8 and the removal of barriers to behavioural change. Stern concluded that leaving out any one of the recommended elements for dealing with climate change will significantly increase the costs of any action which is taken to reduce GHG emissions. This article highlights the complementary measures which currently exist or are under development in Australia, and considers various perspectives on whether they are needed to reduce emissions from the stationary energy sector.

Key concepts: Greenhouse gas, Emissions trading, Stern, Project commissioning, Climate change, Natural resource economics, Business, Environmental economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: What Role for Complementary Emissions Reduction Regulatory Measures? — Research Paper | ScholarLens