The Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal: A Transnational Analysis of the Negative Effect of Competence
Ozlem Susler
Abstract
Ozlem Susler
Abstract
The issue of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal raises questions such as, who decides whether the arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction and at what stage of the arbitral process should judicial intervention, if any, occur? There are divergent approaches taken by courts to these questions. This article offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to providing priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The issue of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal raises questions such as, who decides whether the arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction and at what stage of the arbitral process should judicial intervention, if any, occur? There are divergent approaches taken by courts to these questions. This article offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to providing priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction.
Key concepts: Tribunal, Jurisdiction, Competence (human resources), Subject-matter jurisdiction, Law, Intervention (counseling), Political science, Project commissioning