Forecasting System Marginal Price Using Multilayer Perceptron and Nonlinear Autoregressive exogenous model
Jooman Noh, Hong Chong Cho
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jooman Noh, Hong Chong Cho
Abstract
Open-access reader
With the introduction of competition in the power generation sector in Korea, determining how much each electricity company should develop and maintain a stable system marginal price (SMP) has become an important issue.In this study, SMP was predicted by comparing the values for each company using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) model among artificial neural networks (ANN), and setting electricity demand as an external variable.The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) was also compared.Each method predicted 30, 40, and 50 days.In the case of MLP, optimal results were obtained when the number of hidden layer units were 90, 85, and 80, whereas in the case of NARX, optimal results were obtained when the number of hidden layer units were 95, 80, and 70.Overall, the forecast errors were small in the order of ARIMA, MLP, and NARX for all predictions.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the introduction of competition in the power generation sector in Korea, determining how much each electricity company should develop and maintain a stable system marginal price (SMP) has become an important issue.In this study, SMP was predicted by comparing the values for each company using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) model among artificial neural networks (ANN), and setting electricity demand as an external variable.The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) was also compared.Each method predicted 30, 40, and 50 days.In the case of MLP, optimal results were obtained when the number of hidden layer units were 90, 85, and 80, whereas in the case of NARX, optimal results were obtained when the number of hidden layer units were 95, 80, and 70.Overall, the forecast errors were small in the order of ARIMA, MLP, and NARX for all predictions.
Key concepts: Nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model, Autoregressive model, Autoregressive integrated moving average, Nonlinear system, SETAR, Perceptron, STAR model, Multilayer perceptron