2022Asian Journal of Mathematical SciencesOpen access

Untitled research work

Alhaji Abubakar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

One of the major importance of modeling in time series is to forecast future values of that series which requires the use of appropriate method to fit the time series data that are dependent on the nature of the data. However, real-life data are mostly non-stationary and nonlinear. This will be a problem when a model is in appropriately applied to data that does not fits in, the result of the outcome will be inaccurate and this will not give the clear picture of what the data entails in the future events. In this study, the performances of the smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) and the self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models of different orders and regimens were compared on different forms of nonlinear cases of autoregressive under violation of stationarity assumption. Simulated data with features of nonlinearity and non-stationarity were used to compare the performance of the models. The relative performances of the models were examined with a view to identify the best models at orders 1, 2, and 3, and regimen 2 when fitted to linear, trigonometric, exponential, and polynomial autoregressive functions. It was concluded that the SETAR (2, 1) is the best model followed by SETAR (2, 2) to fit linear data, whereas the SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 3) are considered to be the best for an exponential and SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 2) for a polynomial data.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the major importance of modeling in time series is to forecast future values of that series which requires the use of appropriate method to fit the time series data that are dependent on the nature of the data. However, real-life data are mostly non-stationary and nonlinear. This will be a problem when a model is in appropriately applied to data that does not fits in, the result of the outcome will be inaccurate and this will not give the clear picture of what the data entails in the future events. In this study, the performances of the smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) and the self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models of different orders and regimens were compared on different forms of nonlinear cases of autoregressive under violation of stationarity assumption. Simulated data with features of nonlinearity and non-stationarity were used to compare the performance of the models. The relative performances of the models were examined with a view to identify the best models at orders 1, 2, and 3, and regimen 2 when fitted to linear, trigonometric, exponential, and polynomial autoregressive functions. It was concluded that the SETAR (2, 1) is the best model followed by SETAR (2, 2) to fit linear data, whereas the SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 3) are considered to be the best for an exponential and SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 2) for a polynomial data.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the major importance of modeling in time series is to forecast future values of that series which requires the use of appropriate method to fit the time series data that are dependent on the nature of the data. However, real-life data are mostly non-stationary and nonlinear. This will be a problem when a model is in appropriately applied to data that does not fits in, the result of the outcome will be inaccurate and this will not give the clear picture of what the data entails in the future events. In this study, the performances of the smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) and the self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models of different orders and regimens were compared on different forms of nonlinear cases of autoregressive under violation of stationarity assumption. Simulated data with features of nonlinearity and non-stationarity were used to compare the performance of the models. The relative performances of the models were examined with a view to identify the best models at orders 1, 2, and 3, and regimen 2 when fitted to linear, trigonometric, exponential, and polynomial autoregressive functions. It was concluded that the SETAR (2, 1) is the best model followed by SETAR (2, 2) to fit linear data, whereas the SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 3) are considered to be the best for an exponential and SETAR (2, 2) and STAR (2, 2) for a polynomial data.

Key concepts: SETAR, Autoregressive model, STAR model, Series (stratigraphy), Nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model, Mathematics, Nonlinear system, Exponential function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Untitled research work — Research Paper | ScholarLens