2021IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingOpen access

Synergy of Raman Lidar and Modeled Temperature for Relative Humidity Profiling: Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis

Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Michaël Sicard, María José Granados-Muñoz, Rubén Barragán, Adolfo Comerón, Francesc Rocadenbosch, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, David Garcia-Vizcaino

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Relative humidity (RH) profiling using Raman lidars requires simultaneous range-resolved temperature and pressure data that are not always available. We propose and assess a method based on the use of a locally retrieved atmospheric model to estimate the temperature and pressure profiles. This model relies on the data from daily radiosonde launches at Barcelona during a five-year-long period (2015–2019). We have computed the range-resolved error of the model compared with the radiosonde “true” temperature profiles. Then, we have calculated the induced uncertainty in the recalculated RH profiles, finding that the standard deviation at 5 km isin situradiosonde humidity measurements, finding, in this case, bigger differences due to additional sources of error. Uncertainty analysis shows that the temperature model is the most significant error source below 4–5 km. For higher altitudes, the noise of the Raman signals may become the main contribution. We show that the resulting uncertainty (commonly <15% below 5 km) is compatible with the statistical analysis of the model and comparable with the ones obtained using other instruments for temperature profiling. We show that this method permits nocturnal lidar-based RH profiling with uncertainty estimation without the need for measured atmospheric profiles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Relative humidity (RH) profiling using Raman lidars requires simultaneous range-resolved temperature and pressure data that are not always available. We propose and assess a method based on the use of a locally retrieved atmospheric model to estimate the temperature and pressure profiles. This model relies on the data from daily radiosonde launches at Barcelona during a five-year-long period (2015–2019). We have computed the range-resolved error of the model compared with the radiosonde “true” temperature profiles. Then, we have calculated the induced uncertainty in the recalculated RH profiles, finding that the standard deviation at 5 km isin situradiosonde humidity measurements, finding, in this case, bigger differences due to additional sources of error. Uncertainty analysis shows that the temperature model is the most significant error source below 4–5 km. For higher altitudes, the noise of the Raman signals may become the main contribution. We show that the resulting uncertainty (commonly <15% below 5 km) is compatible with the statistical analysis of the model and comparable with the ones obtained using other instruments for temperature profiling. We show that this method permits nocturnal lidar-based RH profiling with uncertainty estimation without the need for measured atmospheric profiles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Relative humidity (RH) profiling using Raman lidars requires simultaneous range-resolved temperature and pressure data that are not always available. We propose and assess a method based on the use of a locally retrieved atmospheric model to estimate the temperature and pressure profiles. This model relies on the data from daily radiosonde launches at Barcelona during a five-year-long period (2015–2019). We have computed the range-resolved error of the model compared with the radiosonde “true” temperature profiles. Then, we have calculated the induced uncertainty in the recalculated RH profiles, finding that the standard deviation at 5 km isin situradiosonde humidity measurements, finding, in this case, bigger differences due to additional sources of error. Uncertainty analysis shows that the temperature model is the most significant error source below 4–5 km. For higher altitudes, the noise of the Raman signals may become the main contribution. We show that the resulting uncertainty (commonly <15% below 5 km) is compatible with the statistical analysis of the model and comparable with the ones obtained using other instruments for temperature profiling. We show that this method permits nocturnal lidar-based RH profiling with uncertainty estimation without the need for measured atmospheric profiles.

Key concepts: Radiosonde, Lidar, Environmental science, Standard deviation, Atmospheric temperature, Humidity, Meteorology, Remote sensing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Synergy of Raman Lidar and Modeled Temperature for Relative Humidity Profiling: Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens