2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Development of the System of Economic Policy

Waltraud Schelkle

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

India’s system of government and economy displays features so singular that it hardly seems possible to classify it among the categories in current usage. In the political economy of developing countries, India has given occasion to coin new terms characterizing systems of this type. What terms like “mixed economy”, “intermediate regime” (Kalecki), or “soft state” (Myrdal) have in common is that they raise their hybrid character to the level of a defining characteristic. In India, the following constellations are likely to have been responsible for this impression: – India’s independence in 1947 meant the emergence of the world’s most populous democracy. This form of government presupposes theoretically a certain degree of homogeneity of the population forming the state, and this population should feel bound through certain fundamental inalienable values. Yet India’s populace, strongly segmented across linguistic and cultural lines, by no means meets this requirement.77 Its federalist organization into 23 states and 8 union territories, basically in keeping with linguistic criteria, may do justice to these disparities. The federal element of India’s constitution is, however, largely counteracted by a strongly centralist administration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

India’s system of government and economy displays features so singular that it hardly seems possible to classify it among the categories in current usage. In the political economy of developing countries, India has given occasion to coin new terms characterizing systems of this type. What terms like “mixed economy”, “intermediate regime” (Kalecki), or “soft state” (Myrdal) have in common is that they raise their hybrid character to the level of a defining characteristic. In India, the following constellations are likely to have been responsible for this impression: – India’s independence in 1947 meant the emergence of the world’s most populous democracy. This form of government presupposes theoretically a certain degree of homogeneity of the population forming the state, and this population should feel bound through certain fundamental inalienable values. Yet India’s populace, strongly segmented across linguistic and cultural lines, by no means meets this requirement.77 Its federalist organization into 23 states and 8 union territories, basically in keeping with linguistic criteria, may do justice to these disparities. The federal element of India’s constitution is, however, largely counteracted by a strongly centralist administration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

India’s system of government and economy displays features so singular that it hardly seems possible to classify it among the categories in current usage. In the political economy of developing countries, India has given occasion to coin new terms characterizing systems of this type. What terms like “mixed economy”, “intermediate regime” (Kalecki), or “soft state” (Myrdal) have in common is that they raise their hybrid character to the level of a defining characteristic. In India, the following constellations are likely to have been responsible for this impression: – India’s independence in 1947 meant the emergence of the world’s most populous democracy. This form of government presupposes theoretically a certain degree of homogeneity of the population forming the state, and this population should feel bound through certain fundamental inalienable values. Yet India’s populace, strongly segmented across linguistic and cultural lines, by no means meets this requirement.77 Its federalist organization into 23 states and 8 union territories, basically in keeping with linguistic criteria, may do justice to these disparities. The federal element of India’s constitution is, however, largely counteracted by a strongly centralist administration.

Key concepts: Development (topology), Economic system, Economics, Mathematics, Mathematical analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Development of the System of Economic Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens