2021PubMedRequires access

Efficacy of focal muscular vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in subjects with stroke outcomes: randomized controlled trial.

Irene Giovanna Aprile, Chiara Iacovelli, Cristiano Pecchioli, Arianna Cruciani, Letizia Castelli, Marco Germanotta

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Focal muscular vibration (FMV) is a non-invasive technique that showed positive effects on spasticity of the upper limb in stroke subjects but different protocols have been proposed so the studies are not comparable and, to date, it is not clear which muscles should be treated, agonist, or antagonist muscles to obtain the better result on spasticity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects on spasticity of FMV on the upper limb flexor spastic muscles compared to the effects of FMV on the upper limb extensor muscles in subacute stroke patients. We treated 28 subacute stroke patients (mean age 64.28±13.79) randomized into two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A was treated by applying FMV to the flexor muscles of the upper limb, while Group B was treated by applying FMV to the extensor muscles of the upper limb. The effects on spasticity were assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (primary outcome) and the upper limb motor function by instrumental robotic outcomes; moreover, muscle strength and pain were evaluated using Motricity Index and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively (secondary outcomes). Patients were subjected to FMV for three consecutive days and were evaluated three times: before treatment (T0), after a week (T1) and after a month (T2) from the end of treatment. Within group, analysis showed statistically significant changes over time of the MAS at the three joints (shoulder, elbow and wrist) in both groups, but post-hoc analysis showed that, only in Group A, MAS was significantly lower at T2, when compared with T0 at the shoulder and elbow. NRS, significantly changed over time only in the Group B. Motricity Index, did not change over time neither in the Group A, nor in the Group B. No statistically significant differences were detected in the between group analysis. Regarding the instrumental robotic outcomes, we detected a statistically significant reduction of the time required to complete the task (Duration) in both group a T2. In conclusion, this study highlighted how the same treatment protocol can determine an improvement in muscle tone and in the Duration to perform a task, regardless of the muscles treated, while the pain improves if we treat the agonist muscles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Focal muscular vibration (FMV) is a non-invasive technique that showed positive effects on spasticity of the upper limb in stroke subjects but different protocols have been proposed so the studies are not comparable and, to date, it is not clear which muscles should be treated, agonist, or antagonist muscles to obtain the better result on spasticity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects on spasticity of FMV on the upper limb flexor spastic muscles compared to the effects of FMV on the upper limb extensor muscles in subacute stroke patients. We treated 28 subacute stroke patients (mean age 64.28±13.79) randomized into two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A was treated by applying FMV to the flexor muscles of the upper limb, while Group B was treated by applying FMV to the extensor muscles of the upper limb. The effects on spasticity were assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (primary outcome) and the upper limb motor function by instrumental robotic outcomes; moreover, muscle strength and pain were evaluated using Motricity Index and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively (secondary outcomes). Patients were subjected to FMV for three consecutive days and were evaluated three times: before treatment (T0), after a week (T1) and after a month (T2) from the end of treatment. Within group, analysis showed statistically significant changes over time of the MAS at the three joints (shoulder, elbow and wrist) in both groups, but post-hoc analysis showed that, only in Group A, MAS was significantly lower at T2, when compared with T0 at the shoulder and elbow. NRS, significantly changed over time only in the Group B. Motricity Index, did not change over time neither in the Group A, nor in the Group B. No statistically significant differences were detected in the between group analysis. Regarding the instrumental robotic outcomes, we detected a statistically significant reduction of the time required to complete the task (Duration) in both group a T2. In conclusion, this study highlighted how the same treatment protocol can determine an improvement in muscle tone and in the Duration to perform a task, regardless of the muscles treated, while the pain improves if we treat the agonist muscles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Focal muscular vibration (FMV) is a non-invasive technique that showed positive effects on spasticity of the upper limb in stroke subjects but different protocols have been proposed so the studies are not comparable and, to date, it is not clear which muscles should be treated, agonist, or antagonist muscles to obtain the better result on spasticity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects on spasticity of FMV on the upper limb flexor spastic muscles compared to the effects of FMV on the upper limb extensor muscles in subacute stroke patients. We treated 28 subacute stroke patients (mean age 64.28±13.79) randomized into two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A was treated by applying FMV to the flexor muscles of the upper limb, while Group B was treated by applying FMV to the extensor muscles of the upper limb. The effects on spasticity were assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (primary outcome) and the upper limb motor function by instrumental robotic outcomes; moreover, muscle strength and pain were evaluated using Motricity Index and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively (secondary outcomes). Patients were subjected to FMV for three consecutive days and were evaluated three times: before treatment (T0), after a week (T1) and after a month (T2) from the end of treatment. Within group, analysis showed statistically significant changes over time of the MAS at the three joints (shoulder, elbow and wrist) in both groups, but post-hoc analysis showed that, only in Group A, MAS was significantly lower at T2, when compared with T0 at the shoulder and elbow. NRS, significantly changed over time only in the Group B. Motricity Index, did not change over time neither in the Group A, nor in the Group B. No statistically significant differences were detected in the between group analysis. Regarding the instrumental robotic outcomes, we detected a statistically significant reduction of the time required to complete the task (Duration) in both group a T2. In conclusion, this study highlighted how the same treatment protocol can determine an improvement in muscle tone and in the Duration to perform a task, regardless of the muscles treated, while the pain improves if we treat the agonist muscles.

Key concepts: Spasticity, Medicine, Upper limb, Elbow, Modified Ashworth scale, Stroke (engine), Spastic, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of focal muscular vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in subjects with stroke outcomes: randomized controlled trial. — Research Paper | ScholarLens