2020•Turkish Online Journal of Distance EducationOpen access

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN OPEN EDUCATION SYSTEM: STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT OPEN-ENDED QUESTION (OEQ) PRACTICE

Nejdet Karadağ, Belgin Boz Yüksekdağ, Murat Akyıldız, Ali Ihsan Ibileme

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine students' opinions about open-ended question exam practice during 2018-2019 academic year for the following programs of Anadolu University Open Education System: Economy, Hospitality Management, Philosophy, History, Sociology, and Turkish Language and Literature.The study was designed as a quantitative study that describes an existing situation.The measurement tool developed to achieve that purpose includes 5 Likert type questions, 8 closed-ended question -3 of which are yes-no questions-, and 2 open-ended questions.The data were collected between February 14 th 2020 and February 16 th 2020 and 3236 students responded to the tool in total.Percentage-frequency tables and graphs were used for the analysis of the data collected.Since each question in the tool measured a different and independent dimension of the research, the tool was not taken as a scale, so each question was analyzed separately.The data were recoded for certain questions and chi-square analysis was done by using "age", "gender" and "the program they attend" variables.The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study is to determine students' opinions about open-ended question exam practice during 2018-2019 academic year for the following programs of Anadolu University Open Education System: Economy, Hospitality Management, Philosophy, History, Sociology, and Turkish Language and Literature.The study was designed as a quantitative study that describes an existing situation.The measurement tool developed to achieve that purpose includes 5 Likert type questions, 8 closed-ended question -3 of which are yes-no questions-, and 2 open-ended questions.The data were collected between February 14 th 2020 and February 16 th 2020 and 3236 students responded to the tool in total.Percentage-frequency tables and graphs were used for the analysis of the data collected.Since each question in the tool measured a different and independent dimension of the research, the tool was not taken as a scale, so each question was analyzed separately.The data were recoded for certain questions and chi-square analysis was done by using "age", "gender" and "the program they attend" variables.The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study is to determine students' opinions about open-ended question exam practice during 2018-2019 academic year for the following programs of Anadolu University Open Education System: Economy, Hospitality Management, Philosophy, History, Sociology, and Turkish Language and Literature.The study was designed as a quantitative study that describes an existing situation.The measurement tool developed to achieve that purpose includes 5 Likert type questions, 8 closed-ended question -3 of which are yes-no questions-, and 2 open-ended questions.The data were collected between February 14 th 2020 and February 16 th 2020 and 3236 students responded to the tool in total.Percentage-frequency tables and graphs were used for the analysis of the data collected.Since each question in the tool measured a different and independent dimension of the research, the tool was not taken as a scale, so each question was analyzed separately.The data were recoded for certain questions and chi-square analysis was done by using "age", "gender" and "the program they attend" variables.The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.

Key concepts: Closed-ended question, Turkish, Likert scale, Multiple choice, Subject (documents), Dimension (graph theory), Psychology, Scale (ratio)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN OPEN EDUCATION SYSTEM: STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT OPEN-ENDED QUESTION (OEQ) PRACTICE — Research Paper | ScholarLens