Computerized long‐menu questions as an alternative to open‐ended questions in computerized assessment
Lambert Schuwirth, Cees van der Vleuten, Jelle Stoffers, A. G. W. Peperkamp
Abstract
Lambert Schuwirth, Cees van der Vleuten, Jelle Stoffers, A. G. W. Peperkamp
Abstract
To optimally avoid cueing effects and computer scoring problems in computerized examinations a computerized long-menu question (CLM) was developed. This question type was compared to open-ended questions in one treatment group and to multiple-choice questions in another treatment group. Also, scores were compared to self-perceived computer anxiety of the participants. CLMs yield comparable scores to open-ended questions, but the scores differ significantly from those on multiple-choice tests. Correlations in the first comparison (CLMs with multiple-choice) were higher than those in the second camparison (CLMs with open-ended questions). The amount of positive and negative cueing was considerably higher in the first than in the second comparison. Response times of CLMs were higher than those of multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions, differing significantly from both. Computer anxiety did not influence the mean scores in either comparison. Therefore, in computerized testing CLMs seem to offer an acceptable replacement of open-ended questions.
OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To optimally avoid cueing effects and computer scoring problems in computerized examinations a computerized long-menu question (CLM) was developed. This question type was compared to open-ended questions in one treatment group and to multiple-choice questions in another treatment group. Also, scores were compared to self-perceived computer anxiety of the participants. CLMs yield comparable scores to open-ended questions, but the scores differ significantly from those on multiple-choice tests. Correlations in the first comparison (CLMs with multiple-choice) were higher than those in the second camparison (CLMs with open-ended questions). The amount of positive and negative cueing was considerably higher in the first than in the second comparison. Response times of CLMs were higher than those of multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions, differing significantly from both. Computer anxiety did not influence the mean scores in either comparison. Therefore, in computerized testing CLMs seem to offer an acceptable replacement of open-ended questions.
Key concepts: Closed-ended question, Multiple choice, Anxiety, Psychology, Open label, Social psychology, Clinical psychology, Medicine