2020•Journal of Law Policy and GlobalizationOpen access

Authority of Discretion of Regional Heads in Government Implementation to Make Public Welfare

Oloan Paniaran Nababan, Azis Budianto

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the State of Indonesia is a rule of law, which implies that the system of governance of the Republic of Indonesia must be based on the principle of people's sovereignty and the principle of a rule of law.Basically, discretion is inherent in the government in line with the increasing demands for public services that the government must provide for the socio-economic life of citizens of a very dynamic developing state. In essence, the giving of discretion is the granting of authority, and in relation to the granting of that authority in administrative law there is no authority without accountability. This can be interpreted that in the use of discretion there is responsibility.Discretionary actions or legal actions from government positions carried out by office holders or government officials as an organ of government, need to be balanced by institutions or bodies that have a role as a control agency. Thus the legal position of government officials has a high level of prudence, and has compliance based on the concept of public law as representatives of government positions or organs, and their discretionary actions can be accounted for by policy actors. Keywords: Authority, Secretion, Regional Head and Government Administration DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/103-04 Publication date: November 30 th 2020

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the State of Indonesia is a rule of law, which implies that the system of governance of the Republic of Indonesia must be based on the principle of people's sovereignty and the principle of a rule of law.Basically, discretion is inherent in the government in line with the increasing demands for public services that the government must provide for the socio-economic life of citizens of a very dynamic developing state. In essence, the giving of discretion is the granting of authority, and in relation to the granting of that authority in administrative law there is no authority without accountability. This can be interpreted that in the use of discretion there is responsibility.Discretionary actions or legal actions from government positions carried out by office holders or government officials as an organ of government, need to be balanced by institutions or bodies that have a role as a control agency. Thus the legal position of government officials has a high level of prudence, and has compliance based on the concept of public law as representatives of government positions or organs, and their discretionary actions can be accounted for by policy actors. Keywords: Authority, Secretion, Regional Head and Government Administration DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/103-04 Publication date: November 30 th 2020

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the State of Indonesia is a rule of law, which implies that the system of governance of the Republic of Indonesia must be based on the principle of people's sovereignty and the principle of a rule of law.Basically, discretion is inherent in the government in line with the increasing demands for public services that the government must provide for the socio-economic life of citizens of a very dynamic developing state. In essence, the giving of discretion is the granting of authority, and in relation to the granting of that authority in administrative law there is no authority without accountability. This can be interpreted that in the use of discretion there is responsibility.Discretionary actions or legal actions from government positions carried out by office holders or government officials as an organ of government, need to be balanced by institutions or bodies that have a role as a control agency. Thus the legal position of government officials has a high level of prudence, and has compliance based on the concept of public law as representatives of government positions or organs, and their discretionary actions can be accounted for by policy actors. Keywords: Authority, Secretion, Regional Head and Government Administration DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/103-04 Publication date: November 30 th 2020

Key concepts: Discretion, Sovereignty, Government (linguistics), Law, Agency (philosophy), Administrative law, Constitution, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Authority of Discretion of Regional Heads in Government Implementation to Make Public Welfare — Research Paper | ScholarLens