2020•Oxford University Press eBooksOpen access

The Ontogeny of Quine’s Ontology

Greg Frost‐Arnold

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Quine’s philosophical views did not emerge fully formed in the 1930s; rather, they changed over the seven decades he was philosophically active. This chapter investigates two episodes in Quine’s ontological development: his engagement with Pythagoreanism (an Appendix with new primary sources is included), and his conversion from nominalism to Platonism about mathematics. These two topics might seem completely distinct. However, although they could conceivably be treated separately, this chapter treats them together by considering the role clarity plays in both these episodes. Quine’s changing views about the theoretical virtue of clarity, and which particular things are clear and which are not, help explain his ontological development. In particular, the chapter offers a new hypothesis about the causes of Quine’s conversion from nominalism to realism, in which his views about clarity play an essential role.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quine’s philosophical views did not emerge fully formed in the 1930s; rather, they changed over the seven decades he was philosophically active. This chapter investigates two episodes in Quine’s ontological development: his engagement with Pythagoreanism (an Appendix with new primary sources is included), and his conversion from nominalism to Platonism about mathematics. These two topics might seem completely distinct. However, although they could conceivably be treated separately, this chapter treats them together by considering the role clarity plays in both these episodes. Quine’s changing views about the theoretical virtue of clarity, and which particular things are clear and which are not, help explain his ontological development. In particular, the chapter offers a new hypothesis about the causes of Quine’s conversion from nominalism to realism, in which his views about clarity play an essential role.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quine’s philosophical views did not emerge fully formed in the 1930s; rather, they changed over the seven decades he was philosophically active. This chapter investigates two episodes in Quine’s ontological development: his engagement with Pythagoreanism (an Appendix with new primary sources is included), and his conversion from nominalism to Platonism about mathematics. These two topics might seem completely distinct. However, although they could conceivably be treated separately, this chapter treats them together by considering the role clarity plays in both these episodes. Quine’s changing views about the theoretical virtue of clarity, and which particular things are clear and which are not, help explain his ontological development. In particular, the chapter offers a new hypothesis about the causes of Quine’s conversion from nominalism to realism, in which his views about clarity play an essential role.

Key concepts: Quine, Nominalism, CLARITY, Epistemology, Philosophy, Ontology, Virtue, Realism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Ontogeny of Quine’s Ontology — Research Paper | ScholarLens