2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Development and testing of modifications on an STS combine to improve grain quality in corn

Seth Alexander Williams

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Laboratory tests were conducted using a stationary test stand to determine the effects of specific ear orientation into a STS feed accelerator. Replications for three different treatments were conducted as follows: roll-in, random, and tip-in ear orientation. The roll-in orientation had the lowest grain damage at 1.3%, while the highest damage was the tip-in orientation at 3.1%. Modifications to an STS combine were designed to obtain the desired roll-in orientation into the feed accelerator. The three modifications were: rolled auger trough, rock trap door, and cradled feeder house chain, which were field tested in the fall of 2001 in 17% kernel moisture content. Desired roll-in ear orientation was accomplished; however, it was lost before entering the feed accelerator. The largest difference in mechanical grain damage was seen in the control versus the cradled feeder house chain. The control, which was a standard STS combine, had damage levels of 2.24% versus the cradled feeder house chain at 1.66%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Laboratory tests were conducted using a stationary test stand to determine the effects of specific ear orientation into a STS feed accelerator. Replications for three different treatments were conducted as follows: roll-in, random, and tip-in ear orientation. The roll-in orientation had the lowest grain damage at 1.3%, while the highest damage was the tip-in orientation at 3.1%. Modifications to an STS combine were designed to obtain the desired roll-in orientation into the feed accelerator. The three modifications were: rolled auger trough, rock trap door, and cradled feeder house chain, which were field tested in the fall of 2001 in 17% kernel moisture content. Desired roll-in ear orientation was accomplished; however, it was lost before entering the feed accelerator. The largest difference in mechanical grain damage was seen in the control versus the cradled feeder house chain. The control, which was a standard STS combine, had damage levels of 2.24% versus the cradled feeder house chain at 1.66%.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Laboratory tests were conducted using a stationary test stand to determine the effects of specific ear orientation into a STS feed accelerator. Replications for three different treatments were conducted as follows: roll-in, random, and tip-in ear orientation. The roll-in orientation had the lowest grain damage at 1.3%, while the highest damage was the tip-in orientation at 3.1%. Modifications to an STS combine were designed to obtain the desired roll-in orientation into the feed accelerator. The three modifications were: rolled auger trough, rock trap door, and cradled feeder house chain, which were field tested in the fall of 2001 in 17% kernel moisture content. Desired roll-in ear orientation was accomplished; however, it was lost before entering the feed accelerator. The largest difference in mechanical grain damage was seen in the control versus the cradled feeder house chain. The control, which was a standard STS combine, had damage levels of 2.24% versus the cradled feeder house chain at 1.66%.

Key concepts: Quality (philosophy), Agricultural engineering, Grain quality, Engineering, Agronomy, Environmental science, Biology, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development and testing of modifications on an STS combine to improve grain quality in corn — Research Paper | ScholarLens