2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Light and Period Variations of the Eclipsing Binary AA Ursae Majoris

Jae Woo Lee, Chung‐Uk Lee, Seung‐Lee Kim, Hoil Kim, Jang-Ho Park

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

We present new multiband CCD photometry for AA UMa made on 8 nights between January and March 2009; the $R$ light curves are the first ever compiled. Historical light curves, as well as ours, display partial eclipses and inverse O'Connell effects with Max I fainter than Max II. Among possible spot models, a cool spot on either of the component stars and its variability with time permit good light-curve representations for the system. A total of 194 eclipse timings over 81 yrs, including our five timings, were used for ephemeris computations. We found that the orbital period of the system has varied due to a periodic oscillation overlaid on an upward parabolic variation. The continuous period increase at a fractional rate of $+$1.3$\times$10$^{-10}$ is consistent with that calculated from the W-D code and can be interpreted as a thermal mass transfer from the less to the more massive secondary star at a rate of 6.6$\times$10$^{-8}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The periodic component is in satisfactory accord with a light-time effect due to an unseen companion with a period of 28.2 yrs, a semi-amplitude of 0.007 d, and a minimum mass of $M_3 \sin i_3$=0.25 $M_\odot$ but this period variation could also arise from magnetic activity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We present new multiband CCD photometry for AA UMa made on 8 nights between January and March 2009; the $R$ light curves are the first ever compiled. Historical light curves, as well as ours, display partial eclipses and inverse O'Connell effects with Max I fainter than Max II. Among possible spot models, a cool spot on either of the component stars and its variability with time permit good light-curve representations for the system. A total of 194 eclipse timings over 81 yrs, including our five timings, were used for ephemeris computations. We found that the orbital period of the system has varied due to a periodic oscillation overlaid on an upward parabolic variation. The continuous period increase at a fractional rate of $+$1.3$\times$10$^{-10}$ is consistent with that calculated from the W-D code and can be interpreted as a thermal mass transfer from the less to the more massive secondary star at a rate of 6.6$\times$10$^{-8}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The periodic component is in satisfactory accord with a light-time effect due to an unseen companion with a period of 28.2 yrs, a semi-amplitude of 0.007 d, and a minimum mass of $M_3 \sin i_3$=0.25 $M_\odot$ but this period variation could also arise from magnetic activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We present new multiband CCD photometry for AA UMa made on 8 nights between January and March 2009; the $R$ light curves are the first ever compiled. Historical light curves, as well as ours, display partial eclipses and inverse O'Connell effects with Max I fainter than Max II. Among possible spot models, a cool spot on either of the component stars and its variability with time permit good light-curve representations for the system. A total of 194 eclipse timings over 81 yrs, including our five timings, were used for ephemeris computations. We found that the orbital period of the system has varied due to a periodic oscillation overlaid on an upward parabolic variation. The continuous period increase at a fractional rate of $+$1.3$\times$10$^{-10}$ is consistent with that calculated from the W-D code and can be interpreted as a thermal mass transfer from the less to the more massive secondary star at a rate of 6.6$\times$10$^{-8}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The periodic component is in satisfactory accord with a light-time effect due to an unseen companion with a period of 28.2 yrs, a semi-amplitude of 0.007 d, and a minimum mass of $M_3 \sin i_3$=0.25 $M_\odot$ but this period variation could also arise from magnetic activity.

Key concepts: Light curve, Physics, Orbital period, Astrophysics, Ephemeris, Photometry (optics), Stars, Eclipse

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Light and Period Variations of the Eclipsing Binary AA Ursae Majoris — Research Paper | ScholarLens