2020•The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic AnthropologyRequires access

Conversational Maxims and Conversational Implicature

Lauren R. Zentz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Grice's theory of the “cooperative principle” (CP) includes the two key concepts of conversational implicature and conversational maxims. Implicature can simply be understood as what is unsaid but still meant in a given utterance. The four maxims that Grice delineates are the rules that must be obeyed in a conversation in order for communication to succeed. When speakers obey the CP in an interaction, they cannot feasibly state everything that they intend to say, and thus, Grice claims, they flout, or disobey, various maxims in order to implicate to their interlocutors the full extent of what they really mean. In linguistic anthropology, these ideas have generally been taken up as a statement of a culture‐specific ideology of how language works in interaction. Many have therefore taken it upon themselves to explore, in interaction, how conversational rules and “understoods” happen in specific conversational moments using real conversational data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Grice's theory of the “cooperative principle” (CP) includes the two key concepts of conversational implicature and conversational maxims. Implicature can simply be understood as what is unsaid but still meant in a given utterance. The four maxims that Grice delineates are the rules that must be obeyed in a conversation in order for communication to succeed. When speakers obey the CP in an interaction, they cannot feasibly state everything that they intend to say, and thus, Grice claims, they flout, or disobey, various maxims in order to implicate to their interlocutors the full extent of what they really mean. In linguistic anthropology, these ideas have generally been taken up as a statement of a culture‐specific ideology of how language works in interaction. Many have therefore taken it upon themselves to explore, in interaction, how conversational rules and “understoods” happen in specific conversational moments using real conversational data.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Grice's theory of the “cooperative principle” (CP) includes the two key concepts of conversational implicature and conversational maxims. Implicature can simply be understood as what is unsaid but still meant in a given utterance. The four maxims that Grice delineates are the rules that must be obeyed in a conversation in order for communication to succeed. When speakers obey the CP in an interaction, they cannot feasibly state everything that they intend to say, and thus, Grice claims, they flout, or disobey, various maxims in order to implicate to their interlocutors the full extent of what they really mean. In linguistic anthropology, these ideas have generally been taken up as a statement of a culture‐specific ideology of how language works in interaction. Many have therefore taken it upon themselves to explore, in interaction, how conversational rules and “understoods” happen in specific conversational moments using real conversational data.

Key concepts: Implicature, Grice, Cooperative principle, Utterance, Conversation, Linguistics, Unsaid, Politeness maxims

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conversational Maxims and Conversational Implicature — Research Paper | ScholarLens