2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Students’ perception of summative peer review grading

Lana Zrnić, L. Korov, Juraj Petrović, Predrag Pale

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Peer review is the process of evaluating scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. It has been used and researched in formal education for dozens of years. Still, the results of its application vary greatly depending on the usage context. This paper describes the context, students' perception, and outcomes of using peer review in summative assessments in a first-semester communication skills course for engineering students. Students' opinions were investigated using two surveys and analyzed together with the credit they achieved in peer review assignments. The obtained results describe students' responses to peer review and indicate specific aspects of peer review that need to be taken into consideration when implementing it in higher education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Peer review is the process of evaluating scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. It has been used and researched in formal education for dozens of years. Still, the results of its application vary greatly depending on the usage context. This paper describes the context, students' perception, and outcomes of using peer review in summative assessments in a first-semester communication skills course for engineering students. Students' opinions were investigated using two surveys and analyzed together with the credit they achieved in peer review assignments. The obtained results describe students' responses to peer review and indicate specific aspects of peer review that need to be taken into consideration when implementing it in higher education.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Peer review is the process of evaluating scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. It has been used and researched in formal education for dozens of years. Still, the results of its application vary greatly depending on the usage context. This paper describes the context, students' perception, and outcomes of using peer review in summative assessments in a first-semester communication skills course for engineering students. Students' opinions were investigated using two surveys and analyzed together with the credit they achieved in peer review assignments. The obtained results describe students' responses to peer review and indicate specific aspects of peer review that need to be taken into consideration when implementing it in higher education.

Key concepts: Summative assessment, Perception, Grading (engineering), Peer assessment, Computer science, Peer feedback, Context (archaeology), Peer review

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Students’ perception of summative peer review grading — Research Paper | ScholarLens