2017Unpublished venueRequires access

A children’s rights approach to refugee law?

Samantha Arnold

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter seeks to establish whether or not a children’s rights approach to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention is possible. This chapter shows that there is a precedent for one human rights regime influencing another, generally, and international children’s rights law influencing refugee law, specifically. This is done by looking at general rules of treaty interpretation. The object and purpose of both the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Refugee Convention are analysed to identify if there is scope for cross-treaty interpretation. Guidance from the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are principal sources in the justification for the potential for a children’s rights approach. Chapter 5 also looks at some key terminology relating to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention concerning children. The definition of ‘refugee’, the interpretation of persecution and the convention grounds in their application in children’s cases are examined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter seeks to establish whether or not a children’s rights approach to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention is possible. This chapter shows that there is a precedent for one human rights regime influencing another, generally, and international children’s rights law influencing refugee law, specifically. This is done by looking at general rules of treaty interpretation. The object and purpose of both the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Refugee Convention are analysed to identify if there is scope for cross-treaty interpretation. Guidance from the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are principal sources in the justification for the potential for a children’s rights approach. Chapter 5 also looks at some key terminology relating to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention concerning children. The definition of ‘refugee’, the interpretation of persecution and the convention grounds in their application in children’s cases are examined.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter seeks to establish whether or not a children’s rights approach to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention is possible. This chapter shows that there is a precedent for one human rights regime influencing another, generally, and international children’s rights law influencing refugee law, specifically. This is done by looking at general rules of treaty interpretation. The object and purpose of both the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Refugee Convention are analysed to identify if there is scope for cross-treaty interpretation. Guidance from the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are principal sources in the justification for the potential for a children’s rights approach. Chapter 5 also looks at some key terminology relating to the interpretation of the Refugee Convention concerning children. The definition of ‘refugee’, the interpretation of persecution and the convention grounds in their application in children’s cases are examined.

Key concepts: Refugee, Refugee law, Political science, Law, Law and economics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A children’s rights approach to refugee law? — Research Paper | ScholarLens