2020HypertensionRequires access

Abstract P069: Microvesicles From Enos-suppressed Endothelial Cells Induce Endothelial Cell Dysfunction

Vinícius P. Garcia, Jamie G. Hijmans, Kelly A. Stockelman, Madden Brewster, Hannah Fandl, Clay Rahaman, Lukas Maly, Jared J. Greiner, Christopher A. DeSouza

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity is critical to vascular health. Impaired eNOS activity and diminished NO production are common characteristics of a proatherogenic, dysfunctional endothelial phenotype that is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Extracellular microvesicles, particularly endothelial cell derived microvesicles (EMVs) represent novel mechanistic mediators of endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease. It is unknown whether eNOS suppression affects EMV number and function. We tested the following hypotheses: 1) eNOS blockade increases EMV release; and 2) EMVs derived from eNOS-suppressed cells adversely affect endothelial cell inflammation, apoptosis and NO production. Methods: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were treated with the eNOS inhibitor, L-N G -Nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 300mM) for 24 h. EMVs (CD144 + ) released into the supernatant from cells treated with L-NAME or vehicle were isolated and quantified by flow cytometry. Fresh HUVECs were then treated with either L-NAME-derived or control EMVs for 24 h. To evaluate the role of endocytosis on the endothelial effects of EMVs, HUVECs were pre-incubated (12 h) with EIPA, filipin and chlorpromazine for 2 h, and all experiments repeated. Results: EMV release was markedly higher (~100%; P<0.05) in cells treated with L-NAME compared with control (81±6 vs. 40±7 EMV/μL). L-NAME-generated EMVs induced significantly higher release of IL-6 (38.4±5.1 vs. 21.0±1.9 pg/mL) and IL-8 (38.9±3.5 vs. 27.2±3.1 pg/mL) as well as greater active NF-κB p65 (Ser-536) (9.7±0.7 vs. 6.1±0.6 AU) expression than control EMVs. The expression of activated-caspase-3 was significantly higher in the cells treated with L-NAME (9.5±1.1 vs. 6.4±0.4 AU). Total eNOS (97.1±8.2 vs. 157.5±15.6 AU), activated eNOS (4.9±1.2 vs. 9.1±1.3 AU) and NO production (5.0±0.8 vs. 7.0±0.6 μmol/L) were significantly lower in endothelial cells treated with EMVs from eNOS suppressed cells. Endocytosis blockers mitigated the deleterious endothelial effects of EMVs. Conclusion: eNOS-suppression increases EMV release. Moreover, EMVs from eNOS-suppressed cells increase endothelial cell inflammation and apoptosis and decrease NO production.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity is critical to vascular health. Impaired eNOS activity and diminished NO production are common characteristics of a proatherogenic, dysfunctional endothelial phenotype that is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Extracellular microvesicles, particularly endothelial cell derived microvesicles (EMVs) represent novel mechanistic mediators of endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease. It is unknown whether eNOS suppression affects EMV number and function. We tested the following hypotheses: 1) eNOS blockade increases EMV release; and 2) EMVs derived from eNOS-suppressed cells adversely affect endothelial cell inflammation, apoptosis and NO production. Methods: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were treated with the eNOS inhibitor, L-N G -Nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 300mM) for 24 h. EMVs (CD144 + ) released into the supernatant from cells treated with L-NAME or vehicle were isolated and quantified by flow cytometry. Fresh HUVECs were then treated with either L-NAME-derived or control EMVs for 24 h. To evaluate the role of endocytosis on the endothelial effects of EMVs, HUVECs were pre-incubated (12 h) with EIPA, filipin and chlorpromazine for 2 h, and all experiments repeated. Results: EMV release was markedly higher (~100%; P<0.05) in cells treated with L-NAME compared with control (81±6 vs. 40±7 EMV/μL). L-NAME-generated EMVs induced significantly higher release of IL-6 (38.4±5.1 vs. 21.0±1.9 pg/mL) and IL-8 (38.9±3.5 vs. 27.2±3.1 pg/mL) as well as greater active NF-κB p65 (Ser-536) (9.7±0.7 vs. 6.1±0.6 AU) expression than control EMVs. The expression of activated-caspase-3 was significantly higher in the cells treated with L-NAME (9.5±1.1 vs. 6.4±0.4 AU). Total eNOS (97.1±8.2 vs. 157.5±15.6 AU), activated eNOS (4.9±1.2 vs. 9.1±1.3 AU) and NO production (5.0±0.8 vs. 7.0±0.6 μmol/L) were significantly lower in endothelial cells treated with EMVs from eNOS suppressed cells. Endocytosis blockers mitigated the deleterious endothelial effects of EMVs. Conclusion: eNOS-suppression increases EMV release. Moreover, EMVs from eNOS-suppressed cells increase endothelial cell inflammation and apoptosis and decrease NO production.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity is critical to vascular health. Impaired eNOS activity and diminished NO production are common characteristics of a proatherogenic, dysfunctional endothelial phenotype that is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Extracellular microvesicles, particularly endothelial cell derived microvesicles (EMVs) represent novel mechanistic mediators of endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease. It is unknown whether eNOS suppression affects EMV number and function. We tested the following hypotheses: 1) eNOS blockade increases EMV release; and 2) EMVs derived from eNOS-suppressed cells adversely affect endothelial cell inflammation, apoptosis and NO production. Methods: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were treated with the eNOS inhibitor, L-N G -Nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 300mM) for 24 h. EMVs (CD144 + ) released into the supernatant from cells treated with L-NAME or vehicle were isolated and quantified by flow cytometry. Fresh HUVECs were then treated with either L-NAME-derived or control EMVs for 24 h. To evaluate the role of endocytosis on the endothelial effects of EMVs, HUVECs were pre-incubated (12 h) with EIPA, filipin and chlorpromazine for 2 h, and all experiments repeated. Results: EMV release was markedly higher (~100%; P<0.05) in cells treated with L-NAME compared with control (81±6 vs. 40±7 EMV/μL). L-NAME-generated EMVs induced significantly higher release of IL-6 (38.4±5.1 vs. 21.0±1.9 pg/mL) and IL-8 (38.9±3.5 vs. 27.2±3.1 pg/mL) as well as greater active NF-κB p65 (Ser-536) (9.7±0.7 vs. 6.1±0.6 AU) expression than control EMVs. The expression of activated-caspase-3 was significantly higher in the cells treated with L-NAME (9.5±1.1 vs. 6.4±0.4 AU). Total eNOS (97.1±8.2 vs. 157.5±15.6 AU), activated eNOS (4.9±1.2 vs. 9.1±1.3 AU) and NO production (5.0±0.8 vs. 7.0±0.6 μmol/L) were significantly lower in endothelial cells treated with EMVs from eNOS suppressed cells. Endocytosis blockers mitigated the deleterious endothelial effects of EMVs. Conclusion: eNOS-suppression increases EMV release. Moreover, EMVs from eNOS-suppressed cells increase endothelial cell inflammation and apoptosis and decrease NO production.

Key concepts: Enos, Microvesicles, Endothelial dysfunction, Umbilical vein, Nitric oxide, Endothelial stem cell, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III, Endothelium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abstract P069: Microvesicles From Enos-suppressed Endothelial Cells Induce Endothelial Cell Dysfunction — Research Paper | ScholarLens