2008•Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Open access

Biodiversity as a measure of differences between organic and conventional farming: a case study.

Giuliano Vitali, Giulio Lazzerini, R. Epifani, Marco Vignudelli, Alberto Vicari

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Natural ecosystems are a structural and functional association of biotic-abiotic components within a physic-chemical environment. Such a dynamic aspect gives natural surfaces the ability to maintain high qualitative properties of constitutive resources (water, air, soil), of land (landscape) and of habitat (for animal and vegetal species). These properties are fundamental to the concept of sustainability (Lewandowski et al., 1999) and biodiversity is a way to estimate them in a farm context (Bockstaller and Girardin, 1997) and for a comparative use (Caporali et al., 2003). Biodiversity indicators are largely used for detecting and evaluate the amount and effectiveness of natural surfaces within a farm (Hole et al., 2005). In the following study indicators at plot scale and farm scale were used to compare the effects of organic and conventional management on occurrence of spontaneous vegetation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Natural ecosystems are a structural and functional association of biotic-abiotic components within a physic-chemical environment. Such a dynamic aspect gives natural surfaces the ability to maintain high qualitative properties of constitutive resources (water, air, soil), of land (landscape) and of habitat (for animal and vegetal species). These properties are fundamental to the concept of sustainability (Lewandowski et al., 1999) and biodiversity is a way to estimate them in a farm context (Bockstaller and Girardin, 1997) and for a comparative use (Caporali et al., 2003). Biodiversity indicators are largely used for detecting and evaluate the amount and effectiveness of natural surfaces within a farm (Hole et al., 2005). In the following study indicators at plot scale and farm scale were used to compare the effects of organic and conventional management on occurrence of spontaneous vegetation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Natural ecosystems are a structural and functional association of biotic-abiotic components within a physic-chemical environment. Such a dynamic aspect gives natural surfaces the ability to maintain high qualitative properties of constitutive resources (water, air, soil), of land (landscape) and of habitat (for animal and vegetal species). These properties are fundamental to the concept of sustainability (Lewandowski et al., 1999) and biodiversity is a way to estimate them in a farm context (Bockstaller and Girardin, 1997) and for a comparative use (Caporali et al., 2003). Biodiversity indicators are largely used for detecting and evaluate the amount and effectiveness of natural surfaces within a farm (Hole et al., 2005). In the following study indicators at plot scale and farm scale were used to compare the effects of organic and conventional management on occurrence of spontaneous vegetation.

Key concepts: Organic farming, Biodiversity, Measure (data warehouse), Agriculture, Geography, Environmental science, Environmental resource management, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biodiversity as a measure of differences between organic and conventional farming: a case study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens