2020Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and JusticeOpen access

The “Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege” Principle and Foreseeability of the Criminal Law in the Jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights

Andrei Emil Moise

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Applying a similar legal provision or resorting to the principles of law, in the matter of private law, the judge has the duty to resolve any case when there is a lacunar legislation.Unlike in private law, in criminal law this is impossible, as there are two principles that prevent the court from establishing new facts as crimes and applying punishments that are not expressly provided by criminal law, namely the principle of legality of incrimination (nullum crime sine lege) and the principle of legality of punishment (nulla poena sine lege).In the present study we aimed to analyze the extent to which these principles of criminal law find their expression in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Applying a similar legal provision or resorting to the principles of law, in the matter of private law, the judge has the duty to resolve any case when there is a lacunar legislation.Unlike in private law, in criminal law this is impossible, as there are two principles that prevent the court from establishing new facts as crimes and applying punishments that are not expressly provided by criminal law, namely the principle of legality of incrimination (nullum crime sine lege) and the principle of legality of punishment (nulla poena sine lege).In the present study we aimed to analyze the extent to which these principles of criminal law find their expression in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Applying a similar legal provision or resorting to the principles of law, in the matter of private law, the judge has the duty to resolve any case when there is a lacunar legislation.Unlike in private law, in criminal law this is impossible, as there are two principles that prevent the court from establishing new facts as crimes and applying punishments that are not expressly provided by criminal law, namely the principle of legality of incrimination (nullum crime sine lege) and the principle of legality of punishment (nulla poena sine lege).In the present study we aimed to analyze the extent to which these principles of criminal law find their expression in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.

Key concepts: Law, Jurisprudence, Political science, Criminal law, Human rights

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege” Principle and Foreseeability of the Criminal Law in the Jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens