Influence of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)
Rishabh Dubey, T. H. Sing, Khiromani Nag
Abstract
Rishabh Dubey, T. H. Sing, Khiromani Nag
Abstract
The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2017-18 at the Horticulture Research farm, AKS University, Satna (M.P.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatments consisted of nine combination of different agro input management practices viz., treatments 100 % RDF (Control) (T1), 75 % RDF + 25 % N through VC (T2), 75 % RDF + 25 % N through FYM (T3), 50 % RDF + 50 % N through VC (T4), 50 % RDF + 50 % N through FYM (T5), 100 % RDF + 25% N through VC (T6), 100 % RDF + 25% N through FYM (T7), 100 % RDF + 25% N through FYM + Azotobacter @ 2 kg ha-1+PSB @ 2 kg ha-1 (T8), 100 % RDF + 25% N through VC+ Azotobacter @ 2 kg ha-1+PSB @ 2 kg ha-1 (T9). The maximum net profit/ha was recorded under treatment T9 (Rs. 182392.68) while minimum net profit/ha was obtained in treatment T4 (Rs. 123469.25). The maximum gross profit/ha was recorded in treatment T9 (Rs. 230115.00) whereas, minimum gross profit/ha was recorded in treatment T4 (Rs. 167260.00). Thus, the maximum income (both gross and net) was obtained with T10. The significantly maximum B:C ratio 4.54 was recorded under the treatment (T1). And the minimum B:C ratio 2.66 was recorded under the treatment (T5).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2017-18 at the Horticulture Research farm, AKS University, Satna (M.P.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatments consisted of nine combination of different agro input management practices viz., treatments 100 % RDF (Control) (T1), 75 % RDF + 25 % N through VC (T2), 75 % RDF + 25 % N through FYM (T3), 50 % RDF + 50 % N through VC (T4), 50 % RDF + 50 % N through FYM (T5), 100 % RDF + 25% N through VC (T6), 100 % RDF + 25% N through FYM (T7), 100 % RDF + 25% N through FYM + Azotobacter @ 2 kg ha-1+PSB @ 2 kg ha-1 (T8), 100 % RDF + 25% N through VC+ Azotobacter @ 2 kg ha-1+PSB @ 2 kg ha-1 (T9). The maximum net profit/ha was recorded under treatment T9 (Rs. 182392.68) while minimum net profit/ha was obtained in treatment T4 (Rs. 123469.25). The maximum gross profit/ha was recorded in treatment T9 (Rs. 230115.00) whereas, minimum gross profit/ha was recorded in treatment T4 (Rs. 167260.00). Thus, the maximum income (both gross and net) was obtained with T10. The significantly maximum B:C ratio 4.54 was recorded under the treatment (T1). And the minimum B:C ratio 2.66 was recorded under the treatment (T5).
Key concepts: Mathematics, Nutrient management, Randomized block design, Azotobacter, Field experiment, Animal science, Nutrient, Horticulture