1978Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

United States/Soviet Union Strategic Arms Limitations: a Study of Arms Control and Strategic Stability.

Rose,John P

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss the role of arms limitations at the strategic nuclear level between the United States and the Soviet Union as it contributes to arms control in general and to strategic stability in particular. This approach to arms control/arms limitations is not designed to be technical in nature. To judge the usefulness of past and on-going strategic arms limitation talks a conceptual framework through which one can assess the utility or non-utility of arms control measures is discussed. In assessing arms control and strategic stability this study examines U.S. strategic goals and objectives; the rapid and continuous growth of Soviet strategic nuclear force capabilities the SALT I agreements; the objectives/utility of strategic nuclear forces in both a military and political sense; the strategic nuclear balance; and the utility of follow on strategic arms agreements. The hypothesis of this study suggest that instead of enhancing strategic stability and promoting moderation of competition in strategic armaments--the SALT I accords and post SALT I Soviet behavior illustrate what may be a quest for Soviet strategic superiority rather than parity and a mobilization for war rather than detente and peaceful co-existence. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to discuss the role of arms limitations at the strategic nuclear level between the United States and the Soviet Union as it contributes to arms control in general and to strategic stability in particular. This approach to arms control/arms limitations is not designed to be technical in nature. To judge the usefulness of past and on-going strategic arms limitation talks a conceptual framework through which one can assess the utility or non-utility of arms control measures is discussed. In assessing arms control and strategic stability this study examines U.S. strategic goals and objectives; the rapid and continuous growth of Soviet strategic nuclear force capabilities the SALT I agreements; the objectives/utility of strategic nuclear forces in both a military and political sense; the strategic nuclear balance; and the utility of follow on strategic arms agreements. The hypothesis of this study suggest that instead of enhancing strategic stability and promoting moderation of competition in strategic armaments--the SALT I accords and post SALT I Soviet behavior illustrate what may be a quest for Soviet strategic superiority rather than parity and a mobilization for war rather than detente and peaceful co-existence. (Author)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss the role of arms limitations at the strategic nuclear level between the United States and the Soviet Union as it contributes to arms control in general and to strategic stability in particular. This approach to arms control/arms limitations is not designed to be technical in nature. To judge the usefulness of past and on-going strategic arms limitation talks a conceptual framework through which one can assess the utility or non-utility of arms control measures is discussed. In assessing arms control and strategic stability this study examines U.S. strategic goals and objectives; the rapid and continuous growth of Soviet strategic nuclear force capabilities the SALT I agreements; the objectives/utility of strategic nuclear forces in both a military and political sense; the strategic nuclear balance; and the utility of follow on strategic arms agreements. The hypothesis of this study suggest that instead of enhancing strategic stability and promoting moderation of competition in strategic armaments--the SALT I accords and post SALT I Soviet behavior illustrate what may be a quest for Soviet strategic superiority rather than parity and a mobilization for war rather than detente and peaceful co-existence. (Author)

Key concepts: Arms control, Strategic planning, Strategic goal, Soviet union, Strategic control, Political science, Control (management), Balance (ability)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
United States/Soviet Union Strategic Arms Limitations: a Study of Arms Control and Strategic Stability. — Research Paper | ScholarLens