2020Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Social rights in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights

Eugenia López-Jacoiste

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

By affirming the social dimension of civil and political rights, the European Court of Human Rights has taken on a proactive role developing new ways of understanding human rights ‘in the light of present-day conditions’ or as ‘necessary in a democratic society’. The Court has broadened the scope of certain political and civil rights as encompassing health-related issues or workers’ rights too. The theory of positive obligations is underpinning the very marked trend towards extending the scope of the Convention to private relationships between individuals, particularly regarding environmental issues. However, while the rules of the European Convention must be interpreted in the light of contemporary perceptions, this may not go so far to undermine the object and purpose of the treaty itself. Nor can the theory of margin of appreciation justify an interpretation so broad that it is in fact a substantial modification of the Convention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By affirming the social dimension of civil and political rights, the European Court of Human Rights has taken on a proactive role developing new ways of understanding human rights ‘in the light of present-day conditions’ or as ‘necessary in a democratic society’. The Court has broadened the scope of certain political and civil rights as encompassing health-related issues or workers’ rights too. The theory of positive obligations is underpinning the very marked trend towards extending the scope of the Convention to private relationships between individuals, particularly regarding environmental issues. However, while the rules of the European Convention must be interpreted in the light of contemporary perceptions, this may not go so far to undermine the object and purpose of the treaty itself. Nor can the theory of margin of appreciation justify an interpretation so broad that it is in fact a substantial modification of the Convention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By affirming the social dimension of civil and political rights, the European Court of Human Rights has taken on a proactive role developing new ways of understanding human rights ‘in the light of present-day conditions’ or as ‘necessary in a democratic society’. The Court has broadened the scope of certain political and civil rights as encompassing health-related issues or workers’ rights too. The theory of positive obligations is underpinning the very marked trend towards extending the scope of the Convention to private relationships between individuals, particularly regarding environmental issues. However, while the rules of the European Convention must be interpreted in the light of contemporary perceptions, this may not go so far to undermine the object and purpose of the treaty itself. Nor can the theory of margin of appreciation justify an interpretation so broad that it is in fact a substantial modification of the Convention.

Key concepts: Margin of appreciation, Human rights, Political science, Fundamental rights, Law, Convention, Treaty, Social rights

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social rights in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens