Different approaches to coordinate transformation parameters determination of nonhomogeneous coordinate systems
Roman Shults, Asset Urazaliev, Andriy Annenkov, Olena Nesterenko, Oksana Kucherenko, Kateryna Kim
Abstract
Open-access reader
Roman Shults, Asset Urazaliev, Andriy Annenkov, Olena Nesterenko, Oksana Kucherenko, Kateryna Kim
Abstract
Open-access reader
During reconstruction and restoration of city geodetic networks, there is quite a common problem that is related to the nonhomogeneity of existing geodetic networks. In any city, local authorities operate with their coordinate systems. Such conditions lead to inconsistency between data of different services. There is only one way how to overcome the problem that lies in the creation and deployment of the new common coordinate system for the whole city. But such an approach has a lack connected with the necessity of transformation parameters acquisition for the latest and old coordinate systems. Insofar as old coordinate systems had been created with different accuracy, using various equipment, and measuring technologies, it is not possible to consider them as homogeneous. It means that we cannot use a classical conformal Helmert transformation to link different coordinate systems. In the presented paper were studied the different approaches for transformation parameters acquisition. A case study of the Almaty city coordinate system was researched and compared the following methods: Helmert transformation, bilinear transformation, the second and third-order regression transformation, and the fourth-order conformal polynomial transformation. It was found out that neither of the considered methods maintains the necessary transformation accuracy (>5 cm). That is why the creation of the transformation field using the finite element method (FEM) was suggested. The whole city was divided into triangles using Delaunay triangulation. For each triangle, the transformation parameters were found using affine transformation with the necessary accuracy.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
During reconstruction and restoration of city geodetic networks, there is quite a common problem that is related to the nonhomogeneity of existing geodetic networks. In any city, local authorities operate with their coordinate systems. Such conditions lead to inconsistency between data of different services. There is only one way how to overcome the problem that lies in the creation and deployment of the new common coordinate system for the whole city. But such an approach has a lack connected with the necessity of transformation parameters acquisition for the latest and old coordinate systems. Insofar as old coordinate systems had been created with different accuracy, using various equipment, and measuring technologies, it is not possible to consider them as homogeneous. It means that we cannot use a classical conformal Helmert transformation to link different coordinate systems. In the presented paper were studied the different approaches for transformation parameters acquisition. A case study of the Almaty city coordinate system was researched and compared the following methods: Helmert transformation, bilinear transformation, the second and third-order regression transformation, and the fourth-order conformal polynomial transformation. It was found out that neither of the considered methods maintains the necessary transformation accuracy (>5 cm). That is why the creation of the transformation field using the finite element method (FEM) was suggested. The whole city was divided into triangles using Delaunay triangulation. For each triangle, the transformation parameters were found using affine transformation with the necessary accuracy.
Key concepts: Coordinate system, Transformation (genetics), Geodetic datum, Conformal map, Affine transformation, Elliptic coordinate system, Geographic coordinate conversion, Computer science