1982•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Evaluation of Retroreflective Pavement Markers for Precision and Nonprecision Runways.

Guy S. Brown

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this program was to evaluate the use of retroreflective pavement markers, installed in a configuration duplicating runway centerline and touchdown zone lighting system of a Category II runway on Category I or Nonprecision Approach runways with edge lighting to determine if these retroreflective markers will enhance nighttime visual guidance to provide increased safety of operations and possible reduction in minimums, particularly under wet runway conditions. Visual contact height with the retroreflective pavement marker systems was not enhanced prior to reaching Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) or Decision Height (DH) for nonprecision or Category I approaches respectively; therefore, this system will not permit the reduction in approach minimums for Category I precision or nonprecision approaches. However, the test program demonstrated that the system is effective in improving the safety of operation for final approach, flare and touchdown, landing rollout, and for takeoffs. Particularly under rainy, wet nighttime conditions, the pavement retroreflector significantly enhanced the visual guidance, supplementing that provided by the standard runway edge lights and paint markings which are difficult to see under wet conditions. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this program was to evaluate the use of retroreflective pavement markers, installed in a configuration duplicating runway centerline and touchdown zone lighting system of a Category II runway on Category I or Nonprecision Approach runways with edge lighting to determine if these retroreflective markers will enhance nighttime visual guidance to provide increased safety of operations and possible reduction in minimums, particularly under wet runway conditions. Visual contact height with the retroreflective pavement marker systems was not enhanced prior to reaching Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) or Decision Height (DH) for nonprecision or Category I approaches respectively; therefore, this system will not permit the reduction in approach minimums for Category I precision or nonprecision approaches. However, the test program demonstrated that the system is effective in improving the safety of operation for final approach, flare and touchdown, landing rollout, and for takeoffs. Particularly under rainy, wet nighttime conditions, the pavement retroreflector significantly enhanced the visual guidance, supplementing that provided by the standard runway edge lights and paint markings which are difficult to see under wet conditions. (Author)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this program was to evaluate the use of retroreflective pavement markers, installed in a configuration duplicating runway centerline and touchdown zone lighting system of a Category II runway on Category I or Nonprecision Approach runways with edge lighting to determine if these retroreflective markers will enhance nighttime visual guidance to provide increased safety of operations and possible reduction in minimums, particularly under wet runway conditions. Visual contact height with the retroreflective pavement marker systems was not enhanced prior to reaching Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) or Decision Height (DH) for nonprecision or Category I approaches respectively; therefore, this system will not permit the reduction in approach minimums for Category I precision or nonprecision approaches. However, the test program demonstrated that the system is effective in improving the safety of operation for final approach, flare and touchdown, landing rollout, and for takeoffs. Particularly under rainy, wet nighttime conditions, the pavement retroreflector significantly enhanced the visual guidance, supplementing that provided by the standard runway edge lights and paint markings which are difficult to see under wet conditions. (Author)

Key concepts: Runway, Touchdown, Retroreflector, Descent (aeronautics), Environmental science, Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, Computer science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Retroreflective Pavement Markers for Precision and Nonprecision Runways. — Research Paper | ScholarLens