2020Behavioral InterventionsRequires access

A review of the literature on staff training strategies that minimize trainer involvement

Kathleen E. Marano, Jason C. Vladescu, Kenneth F. Reeve, Tina M. Sidener, David J. Cox

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

Abstract Asynchronous training procedures, which do not require the simultaneous presence of a trainer and trainee, may offer benefits over synchronous training because they may be more efficient, cost‐effective, and easier to disseminate. Additionally, asynchronous training may address low trainer to staff ratios. The purpose of this literature review was to identify studies that used asynchronous training procedures to teach any skill related to job performance. A total of 54 articles (containing 58 experiments) were identified for inclusion. The asynchronous staff training techniques identified included video models, computer‐based instruction, non‐computer based self‐instruction, and self‐instructional packages. The articles were coded according to participant characteristics, settings, training methodology, and outcomes. Results demonstrated that asynchronous training techniques resulted in mastery‐level performance for a variety of skills, although non‐computer‐based self‐instruction had the least consistent outcomes. Future researchers should directly compare asynchronous training strategies, evaluate individual training components, and assess asynchronous training techniques with a wider range of skills.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Asynchronous training procedures, which do not require the simultaneous presence of a trainer and trainee, may offer benefits over synchronous training because they may be more efficient, cost‐effective, and easier to disseminate. Additionally, asynchronous training may address low trainer to staff ratios. The purpose of this literature review was to identify studies that used asynchronous training procedures to teach any skill related to job performance. A total of 54 articles (containing 58 experiments) were identified for inclusion. The asynchronous staff training techniques identified included video models, computer‐based instruction, non‐computer based self‐instruction, and self‐instructional packages. The articles were coded according to participant characteristics, settings, training methodology, and outcomes. Results demonstrated that asynchronous training techniques resulted in mastery‐level performance for a variety of skills, although non‐computer‐based self‐instruction had the least consistent outcomes. Future researchers should directly compare asynchronous training strategies, evaluate individual training components, and assess asynchronous training techniques with a wider range of skills.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Asynchronous training procedures, which do not require the simultaneous presence of a trainer and trainee, may offer benefits over synchronous training because they may be more efficient, cost‐effective, and easier to disseminate. Additionally, asynchronous training may address low trainer to staff ratios. The purpose of this literature review was to identify studies that used asynchronous training procedures to teach any skill related to job performance. A total of 54 articles (containing 58 experiments) were identified for inclusion. The asynchronous staff training techniques identified included video models, computer‐based instruction, non‐computer based self‐instruction, and self‐instructional packages. The articles were coded according to participant characteristics, settings, training methodology, and outcomes. Results demonstrated that asynchronous training techniques resulted in mastery‐level performance for a variety of skills, although non‐computer‐based self‐instruction had the least consistent outcomes. Future researchers should directly compare asynchronous training strategies, evaluate individual training components, and assess asynchronous training techniques with a wider range of skills.

Key concepts: Trainer, Asynchronous communication, Variety (cybernetics), Psychology, Medical education, Computer science, Training (meteorology), Multimedia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A review of the literature on staff training strategies that minimize trainer involvement — Research Paper | ScholarLens