2019Journal of Multidisciplinary Dental ResearchOpen access

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of xylitol toothpaste and xylitol chewing gum on salivary parameters: an in-vivo study.

Kathiresan Ravichandran, Jithesh Jain, Bhakti Jaduram Sadhu, S. R. Ananda, Rebecca Lilda

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Xylitol, a naturally occurring five-carbon sugar polyol, is a white crystalline carbohydrate known since a century ago. Xylitol promotes the remineralisation both by the increasing of saliva rate and inhibition of bacteria growth. Objective: To assess the efficacy of xylitol toothpaste and chewing gum on salivary parameters - salivary pH, RFR and SFR among patients with medium cariogenic risk. Methods: The study population comprises of 40 subjects with medium cariogenic risk were divided into 2 groups of 20 individuals each. Subjects in Group I, Group II were given xylitol tooth paste, and xylitol chewing gum for 3 weeks. The following parameters were assessed before and after the use of xylitol-based products - RFR, SFR, and salivary pH. Results: Both groups showed an increase in the RFR, SFR and pH after three weeks. RFR was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.004), Group II (p=0.000). SFR was found to be statistically significant in Group II (p=0.000). pH was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.001) and Group III (p=0.000). Conclusion: Chewing-gum is comparatively more effective than toothpaste. Considering convenience and affordability for the subjects, chewing-gum may not always be preferred and in that case mouthwash or toothpaste can be used for the promotion of better oral health. Keywords: Chewing gum, Salivary flow, Toothpaste, Xylitol.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Xylitol, a naturally occurring five-carbon sugar polyol, is a white crystalline carbohydrate known since a century ago. Xylitol promotes the remineralisation both by the increasing of saliva rate and inhibition of bacteria growth. Objective: To assess the efficacy of xylitol toothpaste and chewing gum on salivary parameters - salivary pH, RFR and SFR among patients with medium cariogenic risk. Methods: The study population comprises of 40 subjects with medium cariogenic risk were divided into 2 groups of 20 individuals each. Subjects in Group I, Group II were given xylitol tooth paste, and xylitol chewing gum for 3 weeks. The following parameters were assessed before and after the use of xylitol-based products - RFR, SFR, and salivary pH. Results: Both groups showed an increase in the RFR, SFR and pH after three weeks. RFR was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.004), Group II (p=0.000). SFR was found to be statistically significant in Group II (p=0.000). pH was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.001) and Group III (p=0.000). Conclusion: Chewing-gum is comparatively more effective than toothpaste. Considering convenience and affordability for the subjects, chewing-gum may not always be preferred and in that case mouthwash or toothpaste can be used for the promotion of better oral health. Keywords: Chewing gum, Salivary flow, Toothpaste, Xylitol.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Xylitol, a naturally occurring five-carbon sugar polyol, is a white crystalline carbohydrate known since a century ago. Xylitol promotes the remineralisation both by the increasing of saliva rate and inhibition of bacteria growth. Objective: To assess the efficacy of xylitol toothpaste and chewing gum on salivary parameters - salivary pH, RFR and SFR among patients with medium cariogenic risk. Methods: The study population comprises of 40 subjects with medium cariogenic risk were divided into 2 groups of 20 individuals each. Subjects in Group I, Group II were given xylitol tooth paste, and xylitol chewing gum for 3 weeks. The following parameters were assessed before and after the use of xylitol-based products - RFR, SFR, and salivary pH. Results: Both groups showed an increase in the RFR, SFR and pH after three weeks. RFR was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.004), Group II (p=0.000). SFR was found to be statistically significant in Group II (p=0.000). pH was found to be statistically significant in Group I (p=0.001) and Group III (p=0.000). Conclusion: Chewing-gum is comparatively more effective than toothpaste. Considering convenience and affordability for the subjects, chewing-gum may not always be preferred and in that case mouthwash or toothpaste can be used for the promotion of better oral health. Keywords: Chewing gum, Salivary flow, Toothpaste, Xylitol.

Key concepts: Xylitol, Toothpaste, Dentistry, Chewing gum, Saliva, Medicine, Population, Sugar alcohol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of xylitol toothpaste and xylitol chewing gum on salivary parameters: an in-vivo study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens