2020The Journal of Sexual MedicineRequires access

035 Patient Reported Outcomes of a Robotic-Assisted Double-Skin Flap Vaginoplasty Technique for Transfeminine Genital Reconstructive Surgery

Jessica Schardein, S. Blakely, Prashant Upadhyaya, Dmitriy Nikolavsky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Transfeminine genital reconstructive surgery is an important part of gender affirmation for many transgender women. Currently, various vaginoplasty techniques exist for the creation of a neovagina using genital skin flaps/grafts, peritoneal flaps or intestinal segments. While surgical outcomes have been previously reported, patient reported outcomes are limited. The objective of this study is to investigate patient reported outcomes of a modified robotic-assisted double-skin flap vaginoplasty technique. All patients who underwent vaginoplasty using the double-skin flap technique were identified. Intraoperatively, the technique involved creation of a penile skin flap connected to a long inverted U-shaped perineo-scrotal skin flap, combined perineal and robotic-assisted pelvic dissection and robotic colpopexy of the neovagina to the surrounding peritoneum. Patients were assessed at 2-3-month intervals for the first year following vaginal packing removal. Neoclitoral sensation was evaluated at each follow-up visit. Responses from validated questionnaires, including Global Response Assessment (GRA), Female Genital Self Image Scale (FGSIS), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were queried.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transfeminine genital reconstructive surgery is an important part of gender affirmation for many transgender women. Currently, various vaginoplasty techniques exist for the creation of a neovagina using genital skin flaps/grafts, peritoneal flaps or intestinal segments. While surgical outcomes have been previously reported, patient reported outcomes are limited. The objective of this study is to investigate patient reported outcomes of a modified robotic-assisted double-skin flap vaginoplasty technique. All patients who underwent vaginoplasty using the double-skin flap technique were identified. Intraoperatively, the technique involved creation of a penile skin flap connected to a long inverted U-shaped perineo-scrotal skin flap, combined perineal and robotic-assisted pelvic dissection and robotic colpopexy of the neovagina to the surrounding peritoneum. Patients were assessed at 2-3-month intervals for the first year following vaginal packing removal. Neoclitoral sensation was evaluated at each follow-up visit. Responses from validated questionnaires, including Global Response Assessment (GRA), Female Genital Self Image Scale (FGSIS), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were queried.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transfeminine genital reconstructive surgery is an important part of gender affirmation for many transgender women. Currently, various vaginoplasty techniques exist for the creation of a neovagina using genital skin flaps/grafts, peritoneal flaps or intestinal segments. While surgical outcomes have been previously reported, patient reported outcomes are limited. The objective of this study is to investigate patient reported outcomes of a modified robotic-assisted double-skin flap vaginoplasty technique. All patients who underwent vaginoplasty using the double-skin flap technique were identified. Intraoperatively, the technique involved creation of a penile skin flap connected to a long inverted U-shaped perineo-scrotal skin flap, combined perineal and robotic-assisted pelvic dissection and robotic colpopexy of the neovagina to the surrounding peritoneum. Patients were assessed at 2-3-month intervals for the first year following vaginal packing removal. Neoclitoral sensation was evaluated at each follow-up visit. Responses from validated questionnaires, including Global Response Assessment (GRA), Female Genital Self Image Scale (FGSIS), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were queried.

Key concepts: Vaginoplasty, Medicine, Sex organ, Reconstructive surgery, Sex reassignment surgery (male-to-female), Surgery, Transgender, Vagina

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
035 Patient Reported Outcomes of a Robotic-Assisted Double-Skin Flap Vaginoplasty Technique for Transfeminine Genital Reconstructive Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens