20202020 International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (ICCSEA)Requires access

Ranking of fiber reinforced composite materials using PSI and PROMETHEE method

Prabina Kumar Patnaik, Srimant Kumar Mishra, Ande Tara Ashish

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Selection of appropriate materials in design of structural or mechanical components in the specific field engineering application is often observed to be a problem of multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) with conflicting and different objectives. In this investigation, two different methodologies under MCDM approach i.e. Preference selection index (PSI) and Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) are chosen to select suitable composite material for specific engineering design problem using criteria weights for ranking of the alternatives. In this work eight numbers of alternative composites and eight criteria for material selection is used for determining ranking for optimal design. It is observed from this analysis that MCDM approach is quite easy to understand, effortless to execute for assigning rankings to the alternative materials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Selection of appropriate materials in design of structural or mechanical components in the specific field engineering application is often observed to be a problem of multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) with conflicting and different objectives. In this investigation, two different methodologies under MCDM approach i.e. Preference selection index (PSI) and Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) are chosen to select suitable composite material for specific engineering design problem using criteria weights for ranking of the alternatives. In this work eight numbers of alternative composites and eight criteria for material selection is used for determining ranking for optimal design. It is observed from this analysis that MCDM approach is quite easy to understand, effortless to execute for assigning rankings to the alternative materials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Selection of appropriate materials in design of structural or mechanical components in the specific field engineering application is often observed to be a problem of multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) with conflicting and different objectives. In this investigation, two different methodologies under MCDM approach i.e. Preference selection index (PSI) and Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) are chosen to select suitable composite material for specific engineering design problem using criteria weights for ranking of the alternatives. In this work eight numbers of alternative composites and eight criteria for material selection is used for determining ranking for optimal design. It is observed from this analysis that MCDM approach is quite easy to understand, effortless to execute for assigning rankings to the alternative materials.

Key concepts: Ranking (information retrieval), Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Selection (genetic algorithm), Preference, Computer science, Rank (graph theory), Material selection, Field (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ranking of fiber reinforced composite materials using PSI and PROMETHEE method — Research Paper | ScholarLens