2013Procedia EngineeringOpen access

Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology

Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Jurgita Antuchevičienė, Jonas Šaparauskas, Zenonas Turskis

Open full text 140 citations

Abstract

Alternative design solutions of buildings can be successfully evaluated applying Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. There are a lot of methods available for supporting complex decisions in construction. However, previous research works show that various MCDM methods can produce different ranking results. Accordingly, three criteria of optimality, namely WSM (Weighted Sum Model), WPM (Weighted Product Model) and joint method of the latters called WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment) are applied, and their peculiarities are examined by comparing to well-known and reputed MOORA (Multiple Objective Optimisation on the basis of Ratio Analysis) method. A case study of ranking the facades for public and commercial buildings is presented.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alternative design solutions of buildings can be successfully evaluated applying Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. There are a lot of methods available for supporting complex decisions in construction. However, previous research works show that various MCDM methods can produce different ranking results. Accordingly, three criteria of optimality, namely WSM (Weighted Sum Model), WPM (Weighted Product Model) and joint method of the latters called WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment) are applied, and their peculiarities are examined by comparing to well-known and reputed MOORA (Multiple Objective Optimisation on the basis of Ratio Analysis) method. A case study of ranking the facades for public and commercial buildings is presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 140 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alternative design solutions of buildings can be successfully evaluated applying Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. There are a lot of methods available for supporting complex decisions in construction. However, previous research works show that various MCDM methods can produce different ranking results. Accordingly, three criteria of optimality, namely WSM (Weighted Sum Model), WPM (Weighted Product Model) and joint method of the latters called WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment) are applied, and their peculiarities are examined by comparing to well-known and reputed MOORA (Multiple Objective Optimisation on the basis of Ratio Analysis) method. A case study of ranking the facades for public and commercial buildings is presented.

Key concepts: Ranking (information retrieval), Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Product (mathematics), Computer science, Rank (graph theory), Operations research, Mathematics, Data mining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology — Research Paper | ScholarLens