Australian Private Securities Class Actions and Investor Protection
Michael Duffy
Abstract
Michael Duffy
Abstract
The thesis examines whether private securities class actions (PSCAs) can provide investor protection from poor stock market securities disclosure in Australia, defining and exploring each of these concepts. It analyses whether there are legal conceptual or practical obstacles to PSCAs and compares investor protection from poor securities disclosure through PSCAs with public enforcement of securities laws. In doing so it analyses empirical data from the 19 largest successful Australian PSCAs in respect of key attributes and concludes that, though the need for public enforcement remains, Australian PSCAs can provide a species of investor protection from poor securities disclosure.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The thesis examines whether private securities class actions (PSCAs) can provide investor protection from poor stock market securities disclosure in Australia, defining and exploring each of these concepts. It analyses whether there are legal conceptual or practical obstacles to PSCAs and compares investor protection from poor securities disclosure through PSCAs with public enforcement of securities laws. In doing so it analyses empirical data from the 19 largest successful Australian PSCAs in respect of key attributes and concludes that, though the need for public enforcement remains, Australian PSCAs can provide a species of investor protection from poor securities disclosure.
Key concepts: Private placement, Enforcement, Hybrid security, Business, Investor protection, Third market, Class action, Securities fraud