The Proper Role of Securities Act Section 12(2) as an Aftermarket Remedy for Disclosure Violations
Robert N. Rapp
Abstract
Robert N. Rapp
Abstract
Federal securities regulation in the United States has historically been viewed as integrated. The federal securities statutes are singular in their focus upon investor protection, and share the common objectives of promoting honest dealing in securities and maintaining public confidence in markets and those who deal in them.1 The Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act)2 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)3 address the three broad areas of concern for investor protection distribution, trading markets and holding of securities.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Federal securities regulation in the United States has historically been viewed as integrated. The federal securities statutes are singular in their focus upon investor protection, and share the common objectives of promoting honest dealing in securities and maintaining public confidence in markets and those who deal in them.1 The Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act)2 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)3 address the three broad areas of concern for investor protection distribution, trading markets and holding of securities.
Key concepts: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Private placement, National best bid and offer, Broker-dealer, Business, Hybrid security, Investment banking, Investor protection