Comparison of atomic force microscopy and zeta potential derived surface charge density
Mikkel Herzberg, S. Dobberschütz, D.V. Okhrimenko, N. Bovet, Martin Andersson, S. L. S. Stipp, Tue Hassenkam
Abstract
Mikkel Herzberg, S. Dobberschütz, D.V. Okhrimenko, N. Bovet, Martin Andersson, S. L. S. Stipp, Tue Hassenkam
Abstract
Abstract Surface charge density can be derived from atomic force microscopy (AFM) by using Derjaguin, Landau, Vervey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The sub-micrometer data allows observation of local differences in charge density and changes with time or solution composition, which has interesting applications in crystal growth and inhibition, bone formation and colloid behavior. To calibrate this type of AFM data and verify DLVO assumptions, it has to be correlated with an established technique. We successfully matched AFM derived surface charge densities with zeta potential measurements on a mica surface within one order of magnitude. A reproducible difference between surface charge of the mica substrate exposed to solutions cations with monovalent and divalent charge was also observed. The results provide confidence that the AFM method is valid for obtaining local surface charge information.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Surface charge density can be derived from atomic force microscopy (AFM) by using Derjaguin, Landau, Vervey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The sub-micrometer data allows observation of local differences in charge density and changes with time or solution composition, which has interesting applications in crystal growth and inhibition, bone formation and colloid behavior. To calibrate this type of AFM data and verify DLVO assumptions, it has to be correlated with an established technique. We successfully matched AFM derived surface charge densities with zeta potential measurements on a mica surface within one order of magnitude. A reproducible difference between surface charge of the mica substrate exposed to solutions cations with monovalent and divalent charge was also observed. The results provide confidence that the AFM method is valid for obtaining local surface charge information.
Key concepts: Zeta potential, Atomic force microscopy, Surface charge, Charge density, Kelvin probe force microscope, Materials science, Chemical physics, Surface (topology)