2020Europhysics Letters (EPL)Requires access

Comparison of atomic force microscopy and zeta potential derived surface charge density

Mikkel Herzberg, S. Dobberschütz, D.V. Okhrimenko, N. Bovet, Martin Andersson, S. L. S. Stipp, Tue Hassenkam

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Surface charge density can be derived from atomic force microscopy (AFM) by using Derjaguin, Landau, Vervey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The sub-micrometer data allows observation of local differences in charge density and changes with time or solution composition, which has interesting applications in crystal growth and inhibition, bone formation and colloid behavior. To calibrate this type of AFM data and verify DLVO assumptions, it has to be correlated with an established technique. We successfully matched AFM derived surface charge densities with zeta potential measurements on a mica surface within one order of magnitude. A reproducible difference between surface charge of the mica substrate exposed to solutions cations with monovalent and divalent charge was also observed. The results provide confidence that the AFM method is valid for obtaining local surface charge information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Surface charge density can be derived from atomic force microscopy (AFM) by using Derjaguin, Landau, Vervey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The sub-micrometer data allows observation of local differences in charge density and changes with time or solution composition, which has interesting applications in crystal growth and inhibition, bone formation and colloid behavior. To calibrate this type of AFM data and verify DLVO assumptions, it has to be correlated with an established technique. We successfully matched AFM derived surface charge densities with zeta potential measurements on a mica surface within one order of magnitude. A reproducible difference between surface charge of the mica substrate exposed to solutions cations with monovalent and divalent charge was also observed. The results provide confidence that the AFM method is valid for obtaining local surface charge information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Surface charge density can be derived from atomic force microscopy (AFM) by using Derjaguin, Landau, Vervey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The sub-micrometer data allows observation of local differences in charge density and changes with time or solution composition, which has interesting applications in crystal growth and inhibition, bone formation and colloid behavior. To calibrate this type of AFM data and verify DLVO assumptions, it has to be correlated with an established technique. We successfully matched AFM derived surface charge densities with zeta potential measurements on a mica surface within one order of magnitude. A reproducible difference between surface charge of the mica substrate exposed to solutions cations with monovalent and divalent charge was also observed. The results provide confidence that the AFM method is valid for obtaining local surface charge information.

Key concepts: Zeta potential, Atomic force microscopy, Surface charge, Charge density, Kelvin probe force microscope, Materials science, Chemical physics, Surface (topology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of atomic force microscopy and zeta potential derived surface charge density — Research Paper | ScholarLens