Comparison of efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene citrate for induction of ovulation
Ariana Khalis Jawad, Maratab Ali, Rojan K Jawad
Abstract
Ariana Khalis Jawad, Maratab Ali, Rojan K Jawad
Abstract
Background and objective: Ovulatory dysfunction is a common cause of infertility. This study aimed to determine if letrozole is more efficient than clomiphene for the induction of ovulation in a group of un ovulatory infertile women. Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted at the Fertility Center Out-patient Department of Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city, Kurdistan Region, Iraq, from May 2011, to May 2012. Hundred infertile couples having anovulatory infertility were included in the study; 50 women (146 cycles) were given letrozole 5 mg for three cycles, and 50 (148 cycles) women were put on clomiphene citrate (CC) 100 mg for three cycles, from day 2 to day 6 of the menstrual cycle. The diagnosis of pregnancy was confirmed by ultrasound. Two-tailed independent t-test was used to compare means, while proportions were compared with the Chi-Square test. Results: Ovulation occurred in 131/150 women in the clomiphene citrate group and 124/150 women in the letrozole group. The total number of mature follicles for clomiphene citrate was 1.44 ±0.56mm, while it was 1.13 ±0.32mm for letrozole, which was highly significant (P = 0.001). Endometrial thickness at the time of hCG administration for clomiphene citrate versus letrozole was (7.95 ±1.53mm versus 9.37 ± 2.04mm, P = 0.001) respectively. The pregnancy rate was 16/148 cycles in the clomiphene citrate group and 20/146 cycles in the letrozole group. Conclusion: Letrozole and clomiphene citrate are equally effective for the induction of ovulation and achieving pregnancy in patients with anovulatory infertility.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background and objective: Ovulatory dysfunction is a common cause of infertility. This study aimed to determine if letrozole is more efficient than clomiphene for the induction of ovulation in a group of un ovulatory infertile women. Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted at the Fertility Center Out-patient Department of Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city, Kurdistan Region, Iraq, from May 2011, to May 2012. Hundred infertile couples having anovulatory infertility were included in the study; 50 women (146 cycles) were given letrozole 5 mg for three cycles, and 50 (148 cycles) women were put on clomiphene citrate (CC) 100 mg for three cycles, from day 2 to day 6 of the menstrual cycle. The diagnosis of pregnancy was confirmed by ultrasound. Two-tailed independent t-test was used to compare means, while proportions were compared with the Chi-Square test. Results: Ovulation occurred in 131/150 women in the clomiphene citrate group and 124/150 women in the letrozole group. The total number of mature follicles for clomiphene citrate was 1.44 ±0.56mm, while it was 1.13 ±0.32mm for letrozole, which was highly significant (P = 0.001). Endometrial thickness at the time of hCG administration for clomiphene citrate versus letrozole was (7.95 ±1.53mm versus 9.37 ± 2.04mm, P = 0.001) respectively. The pregnancy rate was 16/148 cycles in the clomiphene citrate group and 20/146 cycles in the letrozole group. Conclusion: Letrozole and clomiphene citrate are equally effective for the induction of ovulation and achieving pregnancy in patients with anovulatory infertility.
Key concepts: Medicine, Letrozole, Ovulation induction, Ovulation, Gynecology, Internal medicine, Hormone, Tamoxifen