2012•Zhonghua shiyan waike zazhiRequires access

Comparison of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine in dogs

Kai Shen, Gang Zhou, Yingjiang Ye, Bin Hang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine.Methods Twelve dogs were divided into two groups:group A ( single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6) ; group B (double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6).The time used for each anastomosis were recorded.The second operations were performed on postoperative day 7 on all the dogs to determine in situ anastomostic bursting pressures (ABP) and the pressures while the serosa layer was tom.Results No anastomosis leak was found in twenty-four stoma of the twelve dogs.There was no significant difference between the stoma created by single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis on intraperitoneal adhesions.The averaged ABP in the single-layer anastomosis group and the double-layer anastomosis group was (325.83 ± 88.03) and (331.25 ± 70.33) cm H2O ( 1 cm H2O =0.098 kPa,P > 0.05 ).The pressures while the serosa layer was torn in the two group was ( 185.42 ± 40.87 ) and ( 182.08 ± 20.72) cm H2O respectively ( P > 0.05 ).The time used for single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis was ( 17.08 ± 3.20 ) and (23.50 ± 2.50 ) minutes respectively (P<0.01 ).Conclusion The single-layer anastomosis is an effective and safe method for the anastomosis of small intestine. Key words: Small intestine ;  Anastomosis;  Anastomosis leak;  Dogs

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine.Methods Twelve dogs were divided into two groups:group A ( single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6) ; group B (double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6).The time used for each anastomosis were recorded.The second operations were performed on postoperative day 7 on all the dogs to determine in situ anastomostic bursting pressures (ABP) and the pressures while the serosa layer was tom.Results No anastomosis leak was found in twenty-four stoma of the twelve dogs.There was no significant difference between the stoma created by single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis on intraperitoneal adhesions.The averaged ABP in the single-layer anastomosis group and the double-layer anastomosis group was (325.83 ± 88.03) and (331.25 ± 70.33) cm H2O ( 1 cm H2O =0.098 kPa,P > 0.05 ).The pressures while the serosa layer was torn in the two group was ( 185.42 ± 40.87 ) and ( 182.08 ± 20.72) cm H2O respectively ( P > 0.05 ).The time used for single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis was ( 17.08 ± 3.20 ) and (23.50 ± 2.50 ) minutes respectively (P<0.01 ).Conclusion The single-layer anastomosis is an effective and safe method for the anastomosis of small intestine. Key words: Small intestine ;  Anastomosis;  Anastomosis leak;  Dogs

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine.Methods Twelve dogs were divided into two groups:group A ( single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6) ; group B (double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament,n =6).The time used for each anastomosis were recorded.The second operations were performed on postoperative day 7 on all the dogs to determine in situ anastomostic bursting pressures (ABP) and the pressures while the serosa layer was tom.Results No anastomosis leak was found in twenty-four stoma of the twelve dogs.There was no significant difference between the stoma created by single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis on intraperitoneal adhesions.The averaged ABP in the single-layer anastomosis group and the double-layer anastomosis group was (325.83 ± 88.03) and (331.25 ± 70.33) cm H2O ( 1 cm H2O =0.098 kPa,P > 0.05 ).The pressures while the serosa layer was torn in the two group was ( 185.42 ± 40.87 ) and ( 182.08 ± 20.72) cm H2O respectively ( P > 0.05 ).The time used for single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis was ( 17.08 ± 3.20 ) and (23.50 ± 2.50 ) minutes respectively (P<0.01 ).Conclusion The single-layer anastomosis is an effective and safe method for the anastomosis of small intestine. Key words: Small intestine ;  Anastomosis;  Anastomosis leak;  Dogs

Key concepts: Anastomosis, Stoma (medicine), Ligament, Significant difference, Small intestine, Anatomy, Medicine, Layer (electronics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine in dogs — Research Paper | ScholarLens