2004Politikon IAPSS Journal of Political ScienceOpen access

Humanitarian Intervention and the Changing Concepts of Sovereignty

Dominika Švarc

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan recently observed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined ... by the forces of globalisation and international cooperation." The article deals with the question of how much this is an accurate observation in the context of humanitarian intervention. Within the theories of classical international law, the principle of nonintervention involves the prohibition to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign State. Even though there have always existed exemptions to this principle, there was never an exemption of humanitarian intervention mentioned, neither in the UN Charter or any other international legal instrument, nor in the customary law. In the article the possibility of new international legal norms evolving in this field is discussed, to justify intervention in the name of protecting fundamental human rights that are today one of the leading concepts of international legal order, tightly connected to the protection of international peace and security in a highly interdependent international community. To clarify the concept, some basic elements and dimensions of humanitarian intervention are outlined, together with some possible features of the future development of the humanitarian intervention concept. The aim of the article is to discover, what is, both in the legal sense and in practice, the relationship between the sovereignty of states and their responsibility to fulfil their obligations under the international law, including the obligation to respect and protect human life and dignity, as well as other fundamental human rights.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan recently observed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined ... by the forces of globalisation and international cooperation." The article deals with the question of how much this is an accurate observation in the context of humanitarian intervention. Within the theories of classical international law, the principle of nonintervention involves the prohibition to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign State. Even though there have always existed exemptions to this principle, there was never an exemption of humanitarian intervention mentioned, neither in the UN Charter or any other international legal instrument, nor in the customary law. In the article the possibility of new international legal norms evolving in this field is discussed, to justify intervention in the name of protecting fundamental human rights that are today one of the leading concepts of international legal order, tightly connected to the protection of international peace and security in a highly interdependent international community. To clarify the concept, some basic elements and dimensions of humanitarian intervention are outlined, together with some possible features of the future development of the humanitarian intervention concept. The aim of the article is to discover, what is, both in the legal sense and in practice, the relationship between the sovereignty of states and their responsibility to fulfil their obligations under the international law, including the obligation to respect and protect human life and dignity, as well as other fundamental human rights.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan recently observed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined ... by the forces of globalisation and international cooperation." The article deals with the question of how much this is an accurate observation in the context of humanitarian intervention. Within the theories of classical international law, the principle of nonintervention involves the prohibition to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign State. Even though there have always existed exemptions to this principle, there was never an exemption of humanitarian intervention mentioned, neither in the UN Charter or any other international legal instrument, nor in the customary law. In the article the possibility of new international legal norms evolving in this field is discussed, to justify intervention in the name of protecting fundamental human rights that are today one of the leading concepts of international legal order, tightly connected to the protection of international peace and security in a highly interdependent international community. To clarify the concept, some basic elements and dimensions of humanitarian intervention are outlined, together with some possible features of the future development of the humanitarian intervention concept. The aim of the article is to discover, what is, both in the legal sense and in practice, the relationship between the sovereignty of states and their responsibility to fulfil their obligations under the international law, including the obligation to respect and protect human life and dignity, as well as other fundamental human rights.

Key concepts: Humanitarian intervention, Sovereignty, Responsibility to protect, International law, United Nations Charter, Law, Human rights, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Humanitarian Intervention and the Changing Concepts of Sovereignty — Research Paper | ScholarLens