2012Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

The effect of MPCNL in treatmentof complex proximal ureteral calculi

Jie-zhi Liao, Yang Ronghua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of MPCNL in the treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi.Methods 90 cases were involved in treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi in our hospital.MPCNL group were 45 cases and U RL group surgery were 45 cases.Results The operation time,bleeding,single surgery success rate,stone-free rate after surgery success for URL and MPCNL were(34.8 ± 10.5) minutes and ( 112.5 ± 12.4) minutes,(12.5 ± 4.6)ml and (51.3 ±3.7)ml,71.1% and 95.6%,91.1% and 97.8% respectively(P < 0.05).Conclusions The operntive time of URL is shorter,blood loss of URL is less than those of MPCNL,but the success rate of surgery and stone-free rate of URL is not higher than those of MPCNL.Both treatment methods are safe and reliable without serious complications. Key words: Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopy; Nephrostomy; percutaneous

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the effect of MPCNL in the treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi.Methods 90 cases were involved in treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi in our hospital.MPCNL group were 45 cases and U RL group surgery were 45 cases.Results The operation time,bleeding,single surgery success rate,stone-free rate after surgery success for URL and MPCNL were(34.8 ± 10.5) minutes and ( 112.5 ± 12.4) minutes,(12.5 ± 4.6)ml and (51.3 ±3.7)ml,71.1% and 95.6%,91.1% and 97.8% respectively(P < 0.05).Conclusions The operntive time of URL is shorter,blood loss of URL is less than those of MPCNL,but the success rate of surgery and stone-free rate of URL is not higher than those of MPCNL.Both treatment methods are safe and reliable without serious complications. Key words: Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopy; Nephrostomy; percutaneous

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the effect of MPCNL in the treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi.Methods 90 cases were involved in treatment of complex proximal ureteral calculi in our hospital.MPCNL group were 45 cases and U RL group surgery were 45 cases.Results The operation time,bleeding,single surgery success rate,stone-free rate after surgery success for URL and MPCNL were(34.8 ± 10.5) minutes and ( 112.5 ± 12.4) minutes,(12.5 ± 4.6)ml and (51.3 ±3.7)ml,71.1% and 95.6%,91.1% and 97.8% respectively(P < 0.05).Conclusions The operntive time of URL is shorter,blood loss of URL is less than those of MPCNL,but the success rate of surgery and stone-free rate of URL is not higher than those of MPCNL.Both treatment methods are safe and reliable without serious complications. Key words: Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopy; Nephrostomy; percutaneous

Key concepts: Medicine, Ureteroscopy, Surgery, Blood loss, Percutaneous, Urology, Ureter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of MPCNL in treatmentof complex proximal ureteral calculi — Research Paper | ScholarLens